| General > General Technical Chat |
| Cheapo clock tear up. |
| << < (3/13) > >> |
| DrG:
--- Quote from: Benta on January 04, 2022, 09:16:54 pm ---Erm... puts on hat and leaves (not tin foil, but Borsalino). --- End quote --- Buh-Bye - here take this link with ya... https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/addiction-and-recovery/201907/stop-seeking-validation-others |
| BrokenYugo:
|
| DrG:
--- Quote from: BrokenYugo on January 04, 2022, 09:23:51 pm ---/-- snip -/ --- End quote --- Ahh yes, such a dazzling comeback - amazing, yet so predictable.... buh-bye and I know either of those links and shiny penny will keep you occupied. Next? Please explain why "Movement is accomplished by two magnets. One is a permanent magnet inside the base of that first gear. The other is an electromagnet (i.e., that coil). Energizing the coil creates a repelling magnetic pulse that moves the gear" is incorrect. Thanks, I notice that was missing. Fourth time I am asking in the thread. |
| Ian.M:
[pedant] Its only repulsion for the first half of each step. Once the rotor has moved 90 decrees. the force is better described as magnetic attraction. [/pedant] :horse: |
| DrG:
What was said by me, was, in fact, correct and pretty much everyone around here can figure that out. To call it a stepper motor and then a Lavet stepper motor is simple intellectualization https://www.dictionary.com/browse/intellectualization, the original response was, at best misleading and at worst just plain wrong - that is my opinion and I have yet to see anyone type anything at all in this thread to make me change my mind - and if that were to happen, I would not have any difficulty standing corrected. Hanging your hat on trivial details which are not at issue makes it difficult to find your hat when you leave. What I said was correct and the point is how difficult it is for the you to even admit as much - I guess I would add the "liker" who could not muster enough gonad to respond in any other way. What I have learned is that there are many people on this forum who have a lot of expertise and it is those folks that I predominantly read and attend to - most often when I am not even in the thread. Most impressive is when they demonstrate that the expertise is accompanied by an emotional IQ above their age. All too common is the - "I didn't really read (or think) much but I am going to jump in to correct what has been written, no matter if I don't know what I am talking about and no matter that it has already been said or anything else...I'm jumping in - no qualifications at all...just jumping in with the wishful wisdom that exists only in their minds". When that is questioned, I understand that it is annoying and it can sting a bit, you want to jump in and tear me a new one (too late now). I am ok with that. To those folks, block me, please, I will do the same...but also please know that I wouldn't be slapping you around if I thought you were half the expert you act like you are. If you were you could have figured out how to respond to the query, repeatedly posted, and you would understand why you should have done so. Peace and no leaves. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |