(I’ve rearranged the order of your questions so that the answers flow better.)
In what way do the "known brand" lead-free solders differ? Are the Chinese ones unreliable in their Sn:Cu ratios?
Yes, but why bother when I can buy it from China much cheaper?
Assuming for the sake of argument that the alloys are exactly what they claim to be, and without impurities, then the differences between brands (and models within brands) are the fluxes, and there are HUGE differences here. For example, Stannol is a huge top-tier solder brand here in Europe, but I don’t like it because I don’t like their fluxes. Compared to brands I prefer, their flux cores seem to be a bit less active, and it “spits” more. With any big name brand solder, you’re at least guaranteed to get what’s on the label. The alloy will be what it claims to be, it’ll be pure, and the flux will be what it claims to be.
With no-name (or counterfeit) Chinese stuff, you aren’t even guaranteed that. The variation (even batch to batch) of no-name Chinese solders is huge, based on reviews online. As I’ve said in other threads on this topic: IMHO, solder is the wrong place to try and go cheap, because solder is such a minuscule part of your project cost. To me it makes no sense to risk damaging an expensive part (because of needing to rework a joint because the solder refuses to flow) to save literally fractions of a penny on solder cost. Or worse, what if the flux ends up being corrosive in the long run, causing the project to fail down the line? A large (1lb or 1/2kg) spool of solder will last a hobbyist years and years, so the cost per project is negligible. I have spent a whopping $60 on solder wire in the past decade, and I’m not even close to having used it up!! At this rate it’ll last me another 20 years.
I can’t say whether it’s true or not, but some people suspect that the cheapest Chinese solders are made of recovered waste solder from e-waste, meaning huge amounts of impurities and highly unpredictable alloying ratios.
From what I can see, pretty much all lead-free solder is Sn99.3/Cu0.7. The only difference seems to be in the flux: rosin, or no-clean.
I thought you wanted
leaded solder? If you are willing to go lead-free, then I highly suggest the Felder SN100Ni+ I recommend here:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/lead-solder-wire-with-ag-vs-cu/msg5441408/#msg5441408As for the alloy: no, not all (nor most) lead-free solder is Sn99.3/Cu0.7. Probably the most common (especially if we include solder paste) is SAC305 (
Sn
Ag
Cu, in the ratio of 96.5/
3.0/
0.
5. It is a near-eutectic and has a melting point of 217 or 218°C depending on who you ask, and it has an inherently slightly matte finish when cooled. I don’t find it to flow particularly well.
Sn99.3/Cu0.7 is a lot cheaper since it doesn’t contain silver. It is eutectic and has a melting point of 227 or 228°C, again depending on the source. It has a shinier surface than SAC305. Because of the shininess and lower cost, retailers that cater to hobbyists tend to carry it the most.
What’s been gaining ground is Sn99.3/Cu0.7 that has the addition of trace amounts of nickel and germanium. Those make it flow better and produce even shinier joints. It goes under many brand names, like K100LD, Sn100Ni+, and more. A good solder of this type — like the inexpensive but excellent Felder I recommend above — is almost as nice to use as good leaded solder, as long as you increase your iron temperature by the necessary 40 degrees C or so.
It remains to be seen whether nickel-germanium-doped Sn99.3/Cu0.7 flows well enough to be used in reflow soldering (see forrestc’s reply above), but for hand soldering and the like, it’s becoming popular.