Author Topic: Colorized video footage of San Francisco from 1906(?) Can we confim the date?  (Read 2200 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ed.KloonkTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
The video (indeed the whole channel) is very interesting by itself. However this is in the description..
Quote
New Version of footage San Francisco 1906, A Trip Down Market Street, Shot on April 14, 1906, four days before the San Francisco earthquake and fire. From the front of a cable car, a motion picture camera records a trip down Market Street, San Francisco, California, from a point between 8th & 9th Streets, Eastward to the cable car turnaround at the Ferry Building,

Further down in the description links the original b/w print scan source from 2018:
https://archive.org/details/MarketStreet19064KScan20181016

Which leads to a particular comment:
Quote
Reviewer: mattydread - November 1, 2018
Subject: 1906? Doubtful...
It's very unlikely this is 1906. Look at the number and type of cars. In 1906, the streets would still have been mostly full of horse-drawn vehicles. The cars of that time would have been very rudimentary and few and far between. Furthermore, I believe I see Model T's driving around and they didn't come on the scene until 1908. Therefore, this film probably dates from the early teens. By that time, San Francisco had largely been rebuilt with the masonry, stone facades you see in this film - the wooden buildings having burned in 1906. Finally, the film quality itself is way too good for 1906. Movie-making was likewise in it's infancy - and film of that time are short, poorly exposed. Still in all - interesting and worthy!

What do you think?

iratus parum formica
 

Offline Stray Electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2253
   First, I didn't watch the entire video. I'm not going to spend the time on it. But I did look at the photo shown in your post and it clearly doesn't match what I saw of the first part of the video.

  But FWIW I have seen colorized photos of San Francisco that were very shortly taken after the 1906 earthquake.  Those photos had also been "photoshopped" to show less damage than what actually occurred!  IIRC it was some kind of publicity move by the city father's to discourage out of state businesses from moving taking their business to other areas that they thought would be safer. It was in a documentary about the 1906 earthquake.

   The clock tower in the photo that you posted should be an easily identifiable landmark.  Find out where is, or was, and what happened to the surrounding area during the earthquake. That should tell you if this photo was taken before the 1906 earthquake or not. But FWIW I don't see any signs of damage in the photo and I know that very few parts of SF escaped damage in the earthquake so my initial impression is that this probably is a pre-earthquake scene.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2022, 03:36:48 pm by Stray Electron »
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8550
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
they're still driving like that. crazy town
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 

Offline BrokenYugo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1214
  • Country: us
If all this stone construction went up post earthquake, then it shouldn't be too hard to date some of the buildings to confirm.
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9002
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
For color photographs:
"Autochrome" was the first commercially available process, introduced in 1907. 
It is a positive transparency process that used colored grains of starch that acted both as an exposure filter to the silver-halide underneath and a viewing filter after the monochrome silver halide layer was developed and removed from the glass plate, leaving the colored grains on the other surface. 
Exposure is very slow, maybe 10 to 30 times slower than standard monochrome emulsions of that era.
Color photographs have been made before that, using hand-tinting of the monochrome print.
Marshall Oils are still made for that purpose, being formulated to work well with the surface of b/w prints.
https://www.dickblick.com/products/marshalls-photo-oils/
 

Online bdunham7

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8175
  • Country: us
I don't see anything out of place for 1906.  This video is obviously highly 'enhanced', the original is readily found.  There is a car that resembles a Model T at 5:36, but with that video and no Ford logo, I would guess that it is just one of many of the cars at the time that generally resembled the Model T.   And the numbers of cars might have been a little higher on Market Street than the general average for the area.  And the buildings along that street were large masonry, banks and such, not the wooden houses that the rest of the city was made out of.  I'm sure that an actual historian would not have any difficulty authenticating or refuting this.  Here's a side-by-side before and after with the original version of this video and a newsreel from the aftermath.  And a narrated version of the original.



« Last Edit: April 17, 2022, 05:33:55 pm by bdunham7 »
A 3.5 digit 4.5 digit 5 digit 5.5 digit 6.5 digit 7.5 digit DMM is good enough for most people.
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk, ledtester

Offline Benta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6420
  • Country: de
I don't see anything wrong about dating the film 1905-06. It's heavily remastered of course.
The comment about "Ford T" is pure ignorance, I don't see a single one. I do see a couple of Ford Model B, which fits timewise.
The other cars are almost impossible to identify, there were hundreds of small car manufacturers back then. One might be a Packard, but it's hard to say.
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1316
  • Country: us
Photo allegedly from 1906 on this page, almost halfway down on the left:

https://opensfhistory.org/search/index.php?q=Market+Street&_ds=1&bn=62&bs=50&so0=contains&so1=contains&sk=6&desc=0

Shows "Sanborn... Wholesale" sign that appears the same.  Also "Wilson" something sign in front of it.
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk

Offline bson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2497
  • Country: us
At 1:13 you can see the Flood Building to the left of center behind the street rail car, with smaller pre-1900 buildings in front of it on Market St (across from Powell St).  Those smaller buildings were destroyed in the earthquake: https://calisphere.org/item/ark:/13030/kt6b69q9n8/   (1:43 is a better view) They look pretty old in that footage.  The Flood Building was finished 1904.  So this would be sometime 1904-1906.

Edit: here's a view dated 1905, and those smaller buildings match.  https://opensfhistory.org/Display/wnp26.384.jpg
I don't think those buildings were actually ever replaced; images from the 50s and 70s shows it being an intersection.  Today it's a plaza and BART entrance.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2022, 05:38:41 am by bson »
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7855
  • Country: au
For color photographs:
"Autochrome" was the first commercially available process, introduced in 1907. 
It is a positive transparency process that used colored grains of starch that acted both as an exposure filter to the silver-halide underneath and a viewing filter after the monochrome silver halide layer was developed and removed from the glass plate, leaving the colored grains on the other surface. 
Exposure is very slow, maybe 10 to 30 times slower than standard monochrome emulsions of that era.
Color photographs have been made before that, using hand-tinting of the monochrome print.
Marshall Oils are still made for that purpose, being formulated to work well with the surface of b/w prints.
https://www.dickblick.com/products/marshalls-photo-oils/

Another method of making colour photographs used in the late 19th Century, was to expose the same scene through Red, Green, & Blue filters, then produce a composite colour picture with a printing press. This gave good quality images, but was really only useful for "Still Life" type shots, or unchanging scenes.
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7855
  • Country: au
they're still driving like that. crazy town
The pedestrians were acting as if they were stoned----a portent of the 1960s, perhaps?
Also, did you notice all the right hand drive cars and horsedrawn vehicles?-----Interesting, no?
« Last Edit: April 18, 2022, 11:12:36 am by vk6zgo »
 

Offline Ed.KloonkTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
they're still driving like that. crazy town
The pedestrians were acting as if they were stoned----a portent of the 1960s, perhaps?
Also, did you notice all the right hand drive cars [and] horsedrawn vehicles?-----Interesting, no?

It was suggested in one of the vids that bdunham7 posted that certain cars may have been included in the movie for bustling effect only in that the narrator mentions that a few cars appear to be doing pointless laps around the carriage doing the filming.
iratus parum formica
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9002
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
they're still driving like that. crazy town
The pedestrians were acting as if they were stoned----a portent of the 1960s, perhaps?
Also, did you notice all the right hand drive cars and horsedrawn vehicles?-----Interesting, no?

In North America, driving on the right side of the road was conventional from the beginning, but it took a while before having the steering wheel on the left was universal.  Some early drivers preferred to see where they were with respect to the edge of the road.  See  http://www.lostinthepond.com/2013/03/fact-american-steering-wheels-havent.html
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8550
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
they're still driving like that. crazy town
The pedestrians were acting as if they were stoned----a portent of the 1960s, perhaps?
Also, did you notice all the right hand drive cars [and] horsedrawn vehicles?-----Interesting, no?

It was suggested in one of the vids that bdunham7 posted that certain cars may have been included in the movie for bustling effect only in that the narrator mentions that a few cars appear to be doing pointless laps around the carriage doing the filming.
that on 46 something license plate keeps coming back. if you watch attentively there are several license plates that keep circling and you can see the cars making u-turns. they typically go around a horse cart to the right , speed up then cut across the front of the car so it looks like they come out of a side street.

As for the date ? i think it was filmed yesterday, the potholes are all still there...
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1316
  • Country: us
As for the date ? i think it was filmed yesterday, the potholes are all still there...

The potholes are still there because you have it so easy in CA...after over 100 years the puny little potholes are the same.  Come over to the northeast for real potholes.
 

Online Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20357
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
As for the date ? i think it was filmed yesterday, the potholes are all still there...

The potholes are still there because you have it so easy in CA...after over 100 years the puny little potholes are the same.  Come over to the northeast for real potholes.
Could the colder climate in the north-east be a factor? When tiny cracks fill with water and the temperature falls below freezing, the expansion causes the cracks to become large holes.  This happens here in the UK, when we get a cold winter.
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9002
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Certain areas of the US (which covers a very large area), including Chicago, go through the freeze-thaw cycle many times during the winter months.
More northerly areas stay frozen, and more southerly areas are unfamiliar with snow and ice and drive accordingly.
 

Online jpanhalt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4002
  • Country: us
In North America, driving on the right side of the road was conventional from the beginning, but it took a while before having the steering wheel on the left was universal.  Some early drivers preferred to see where they were with respect to the edge of the road.  See  http://www.lostinthepond.com/2013/03/fact-american-steering-wheels-havent.html

Or, because stagecoach drivers (probably many horse driven carriages) sat on the right.  The left was for the shotgun.  What's customary is slow to change.
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8550
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage

Or, because stagecoach drivers (probably many horse driven carriages) sat on the right.  The left was for the shotgun.  What's customary is slow to change.
We still have volvo's with a gunrack :)
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf