General > General Technical Chat
Discussing the usage of the TEA thread
pcprogrammer:
--- Quote from: Neper on August 25, 2022, 10:01:18 pm ---When someone has so notoriously treated TEA to the kind of OT stuff that really upsets the moderators, from explosives and firearms (cited literally by gnif among his reasons for intervening) to the most bizarre political statements, and this person then has the gall to publicly complain about purported 'PC' and 'wokeness', one should be allowed to give them a piece of one's mind.
--- End quote ---
You are absolutely right about that you are allowed to express your feelings, but there are ways to do it without being offensive.
Simply stating that the whole ordeal had nothing to do with woke or political correctness, would have sufficed.
The same applies to what Saskia and others wrote. One of the reasons why I like this forum is the lack of "mud slinging" like these examples.
And yes gnif pointed out that it where explosives that tipped the situation into what happened, but to me it seems that you still don't get that it did not upset the moderators. It upset the general public. It was them who poked the moderators to take action.
tautech:
--- Quote from: pcprogrammer on August 26, 2022, 05:04:49 am ---
--- Quote from: Neper on August 25, 2022, 10:01:18 pm ---When someone has so notoriously treated TEA to the kind of OT stuff that really upsets the moderators, from explosives and firearms (cited literally by gnif among his reasons for intervening) to the most bizarre political statements, and this person then has the gall to publicly complain about purported 'PC' and 'wokeness', one should be allowed to give them a piece of one's mind.
--- End quote ---
You are absolutely right about that you are allowed to express your feelings, but there are ways to do it without being offensive.
Simply stating that the whole ordeal had nothing to do with woke or political correctness, would have sufficed.
The same applies to what Saskia and others wrote. One of the reasons why I like this forum is the lack of "mud slinging" like these examples.
And yes gnif pointed out that it where explosives that tipped the situation into what happened, but to me it seems that you still don't get that it did not upset the moderators. It upset the general public. It was them who poked the moderators to take action.
--- End quote ---
Which instead if they or anyone else had engaged with the gal you would find she’s a very capable rocketeer and using explosive propellents is everyday hohum for skilled people such as her.
Again people go off half cocked instead or engaging with someone to learn what they might otherwise know jack shit about.
What are explosives anyway, come on define it !
Everything in another context can mean something entirely different.
Ed.Kloonk:
:popcorn:
gnif:
Combinations of both explosives and also the discussion turning to the political side with gun safety/regulation and a rather lengthy post about how they were used (and misused) in Australia where opinions were flying about what they feel should/shouldn't be allowed and why.... You are saying I removed these because I didn't know the person, but in reality I don't need to, these are topics that are clear cut banned on this forum (politics, guns, explosives). If you want to discuss the chemical reactions of explosives, there are other communities available for that, why bring it here where it's a clear violation of policy to talk about such things, off-topic or not.
tautech:
Well yes gnif do be the model moderator and run expressly by the rule book reacting to every report from all anyone else can see as invisible members. OTOH you’ll never know how many active members you have pissed to leave EEVblog and take their content elsewhere.
Being Solomon is HARD !
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version