General > General Technical Chat

Discussing the usage of the TEA thread

<< < (95/105) > >>

Black Phoenix:

--- Quote from: Bicurico on September 01, 2022, 01:54:09 pm ---(*) Take a look at the two Siglent SSA/SVA threads. They are huge, one is mainly about hacking the options, the other about using the device. Still both threads cover both subjects and, on top of it, they consider two completely different device lines (SSA3000X and SSA3000X-P/SVA1000). This should not have happend and now both threads are very confusing, with the result that most new entries are from people that did not fully read both threads and keep asking the same questions over and over...

--- End quote ---

Saudações Lusitanas, do outro lado do mundo.

This will always happen everywhere in every forum.

There are users, normally new ones who only register to post their question and as soon they have their reply, they simply ghost out.

Could they had read everything and saw if their questions were already answered? Yes they could.

People now just want to have their replies to their questions instantaneously without spending the time to search. Blame the Google generation, that gave the power to most questions being answered in less than 10 sec.

I also hate that mentality, same reason I try to search before I post a new topic just in case someone already started and the solution is inside.

But most don't care. Call it laziness, call it lack of time, call it self centered. But that's something that will not end easily.

bsfeechannel:

--- Quote from: bitseeker on September 01, 2022, 06:56:55 am ---Exactly the answer I expected. I'm done explaining. It's time to move forward, not in circles.

--- End quote ---

You guys are unbelievable. The aardvark wants secession, the dragon wants conciliation, and you think that TEA and EEVBlog are incompatible.

This only goes to show that all the TEA problems have an internal origin to what you called the "community", not the EEVBlog.

bd139:
Out of respect for what we have contributed here over the space of half a decade, bitseeker should have final authority.


Now for something completely different, I'll chip in my opinion:

1. TEA thread should be locked and at the top and bottom a link placed to the TEA groups.io group.
2. There should be no TEA subforum.

EEVblog owner, moderators and patrons need to just let it go. You screwed it and the community moved on. As someone else elegantly said, this is trying to squeeze the toothpaste back into the tube. Don't dilute what is left because the majority of major contributors are gone and to retain it in name or concept is pretty much just plain old theft.

Kosmic:

--- Quote from: bd139 on September 01, 2022, 03:42:05 pm ---
1. TEA thread should be locked and at the top and bottom a link placed to the TEA groups.io group.
2. There should be no TEA subforum.


--- End quote ---

+1, I have the same opinion.

bsfeechannel:

--- Quote from: bd139 on September 01, 2022, 03:42:05 pm ---We screwed it all up by finger-pointing each other to the moderators and what we called the community moved out, blaming the forum for our mistakes, because we do not have maturity to take responsibility for our actions.

--- End quote ---

TIFIFY

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod