General > General Technical Chat
Do you still use stand-alone ("pocket") calculators?
<< < (12/33) > >>
tycz:
For engineering calcs I use a pocket calculator - a fairly ordinary Sharp EL-531WH. It has all the features I need and the interface is excellent. I find it easy to go back and make changes to a previous calculation because it has arrow keys, auto repeat, home/end. There's no history, but there are 8 memory slots which gets the job done.

For (usually low level) programming calcs I find the pocket calculator useless and instead use the program Speed Crunch which has infinite history and copy/paste features. It was the only calculator program I could find that let me switch the output between hex, binary, decimal, and decimal engineering notation on the fly. I also use it for engineering when I've misplaced my pocket calculator, but I don't like it that much. Maybe it's part habit and part ergonomics... engineering calcs are full of symbols and parenthesis, and this isn't great to type on a PC keyboard which requires two hands and lots of key chords on my keyboard with no numpad.
Mr Evil:

--- Quote from: SiliconWizard on January 11, 2020, 11:54:52 pm ---
--- Quote from: blacksheeplogic on January 11, 2020, 08:42:01 pm ---
--- Quote from: SiliconWizard on January 11, 2020, 03:00:18 pm ---The interesting thing all in all I noticed in this thread is that most people still using a pocket calculator are doing this either just from habit, or also because they just don't know (or have bothered) to find decent tools on computer.

--- End quote ---

I did not reach this conclusion and I am not sure how you would from the replies. I suspect you are projecting your preferences and views in the conclusion which is fine when stating your position but I don't think when read objectively that it representative of the the group 'Most'.

--- End quote ---

Just re-read every post made. Apart from ataradov, I haven't seen one that, when considering computer alternatives to calculators, wasn't only talking either about the basic Windows calc (an ugly joke) or mobile apps, which I also dislike as I stated (especially for the UI thing.) So obviously if your only reference to computer alternatives to calculators are these, I'd fully agree that they can't match a real calculator. But there are much more useful and capable software out there as I cited (and ataradov), and I haven't seen anyone talk about them apart from him. So this really looked like indeed "most" people here have this preference out of actually not knowing about better software tools, and I again strongly suggest trying. It's really hard to go back once you have.

As I said, there will certainly always be a personal preference part in this. But just make sure you know all your options, that was my point.

--- End quote ---
I can only speak for myself, but this isn't true. Since this was a topic about pocket calculators, I posted about the software related to that. That doesn't mean that I don't know about or use other software. I use everything from Windows Calc up to writing my own software for specialized tasks.
stefan_trekkie:
I still use my Citizen SR-170 scientific calculator with the original photo cell on it. It was present from my grandma when become EE student ~13-sh years ago. Love it, it was 30€ and back then was a lot poorer and treated as fortune.
I have calculator app on my smarty and it is almost the same and use it on the fly.. On my computer i don't using calc app (or programs) just because i work slowly on them. For some fast electrical calculations I have calculators in the drowning programs that using.

ogden:
There is no single "best" calculator. People have different tasks, different preferences & habits. I use mostly Casio scientific calc. Sometimes I need Excel or Google sheets, https://www.wolframalpha.com/ or GNU Octave. Thanx to this thread, I will definitely check Speed Crunch, thou it may reduce my woframalpha use, not Casio ;)
iMo:
Speed Crunch - nice! Calculator forensic test (in degree mode):

--- Code: ---arcsin(arccos(arctan(tan(cos(sin(9))))))
= 9.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000e0
--- End code ---

Here is PC-1251, HP-25, HP-48GX, WP-34s - not using them except charging NiMH batt in HP-25 (replaced in 2000) every 3-4y or so. Using Anitech SC-100 ("scientific and programmable", purchased new in 1991 for 4.99DEM), original batteries (2x LR-44) lasted for 28 years without leaking, btw..
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod