Oh, for fuck's sake I give up. You're seriously calling me a bigot for confusing "psychological" and "neurological"? Damn, all this time I was sure you were mad at me for the term "weaselly". The distinction between those words has absolutely nothing to do with the point I made, which is what I was damn sure you called me a bigot for. Next time somebody asks you
why you called them a bigot, please actually explain so they can write you off a bit sooner as someone who thinks people who mix up words are bigots.
At this point, I can't figure out if you are a bigotist, willing ignoramus, or troll.
I'm not a bigotist because nobody is a bigotist,
for god's sake stop saying that. What you are accusing me of being is a
bigot, and I'm pretty sure I'm not one of those. I'm also pretty sure I'm not a troll. That leaves "willing ignoramus", which I will go with because I like the word "ignoramus". I will get to work immediately making my "Willing Ignoramus" name tags so people don't have to go to such trouble to figure it out from now on.
I truly hope you get at least talked to if not banned from the forum for it
Banned from the forum? I must really be an ignoramus then, I'm pretty sure I'm far off from that kind of transgression. Unless the rather large off-topic deviation here pisses off Dave, that is, which I suppose it may. But for my supposed "bigotry"? Really?