Yeah, sparkies do tend to have a jumped up sense of self importance, particularly now they have all that complex test equipment to play with!!
And yet I've seen more utter botchery on domestic wiring installs than in any other electrical or electronic systems!
If the wiring is neat, it was some illicit stuff done by a Technician------not an Engineer, their stuff is as "bodgie" as a sparky!
Just so.
Once, 40 years ago, some of my wiring inside a prototype electric door mechanism was criticised as not being especially neat. I agreed, pointing out that I wasn't a technician. I also pointed out something in the design that a technician might have missed. The designer didn't want to acknowledge the issue; the prototype was never reliable.
If I need a diagnosis of a medical problem, I want a doctor to do it. If I want blood taken or a leg plastered, I want a nurse to do it. Vive la difference!
Oh, don't worry, a tech won't miss the problem a few years down the track when the thing fails.
In the meantime, the manufacturer will have "moved on" & be happy having ignored that pesky EE back then!
EEs can definitely miss things, though---one such chap of my acquaintance, designed a really nice, neat interface to convert a output contact function from a remote control from
"made for the duration of the function" to
"momentary".
It worked fine, except that he had assumed that the remote control was
"made for the duration, etc", when in fact, it always was
"momentary".He was a nice bloke, with rather "a lot on his plate", so we just modified the remote control to match his interface.
There were only two such remote controls in existence, so, except for the time used for the (simple) mod, accommodating
his interface was pretty much "revenue neutral", & arguably offered a better match to the "domestic" CD player it now controlled, than a basic relay closure did.