General > General Technical Chat
Electroboom: How Right IS Veritasium?! Don't Electrons Push Each Other??
electrodacus:
--- Quote from: aetherist on June 29, 2022, 02:11:00 am ---An electon is a photon that is propagating along a surface (wire).
Photons have 5 existences --
free photons --
semi-confined (electons) --
confined (electrons O)(photons orbiting a nucleus) --
free electrons (electrons L)(photons that have formed a loop, biting their tail) --
neutrinos (photons that have formed pairs)(sharing the same helical central axis)(180 deg out of phase).
--- End quote ---
So you say the (electon) is a boson but is not one of the 5 we know about else you will not rename it. Is that so ?
Do this (electons) exists at all times and are they found only along the wire surface? Are they present only in or on the surface of metals ?
What is the role of this (electons) ?
Since an imbalance of electrons gets you electrical potential that we measure in (Volts) and a stream of electrons is electrical current that we measure in (Ampers).
aetherist:
--- Quote from: electrodacus on June 29, 2022, 03:07:25 am ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on June 29, 2022, 02:11:00 am ---An electon is a photon that is propagating along a surface (wire).
Photons have 5 existences --
free photons --
semi-confined (electons) --
confined (electrons O)(photons orbiting a nucleus) --
free electrons (electrons L)(photons that have formed a loop, biting their tail) --
neutrinos (photons that have formed pairs)(sharing the same helical central axis)(180 deg out of phase).
--- End quote ---
So you say the (electon) is a boson but is not one of the 5 we know about else you will not rename it. Is that so ?
Do this (electons) exists at all times and are they found only along the wire surface? Are they present only in or on the surface of metals ?
What is the role of this (electons) ?
Since an imbalance of electrons gets you electrical potential that we measure in (Volts) and a stream of electrons is electrical current that we measure in (Ampers).
--- End quote ---
I don’t study standard particle physics. The fundamental particle is the photon. This makes everything we feel & see (except for gravity).
Electons are only found on a surface (& on a nucleus). Probly only on metals. Or possibly on any conductor.
If an electon jumps off a surface it becomes a free photon.
If an electon jumps off a surface onto a nucleus then it becomes an orbiting electon. I wrongly called it an orbiting photon before, which it is (ie electons are photons).
There is no such thing as an orbiting electron.
Volts & Amperes are due to my electons.
However, i am ok with 3 kinds of electricity on/in a wire.
My electons.
Free electrons moving along outside a surface (wire).
Free electrons moving along inside a wire.
They might all contribute to Voltage & Amperage.
U should read the papers by Forrest Bishop, re V & I.
And read the stuff by Ivor Catt.
However, neither Forrest nor Ivor mention my electons.
electrodacus:
--- Quote from: aetherist on June 29, 2022, 03:41:38 am ---I don’t study standard particle physics. The fundamental particle is the photon. This makes everything we feel & see (except for gravity).
Electons are only found on a surface (& on a nucleus). Probly only on metals. Or possibly on any conductor.
If an electon jumps off a surface it becomes a free photon.
If an electon jumps off a surface onto a nucleus then it becomes an orbiting electon. I wrongly called it an orbiting photon before, which it is (ie electons are photons).
There is no such thing as an orbiting electron.
Volts & Amperes are due to my electons.
However, i am ok with 3 kinds of electricity on/in a wire.
My electons.
Free electrons moving along outside a surface (wire).
Free electrons moving along inside a wire.
They might all contribute to Voltage & Amperage.
U should read the papers by Forrest Bishop, re V & I.
And read the stuff by Ivor Catt.
However, neither Forrest nor Ivor mention my electons.
--- End quote ---
I see you are the version of flat earthers. I had the correct idea about you initially but just wanted to make sure.
aetherist:
--- Quote from: electrodacus on June 29, 2022, 03:59:46 am ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on June 29, 2022, 03:41:38 am ---I don’t study standard particle physics. The fundamental particle is the photon. This makes everything we feel & see (except for gravity).
Electons are only found on a surface (& on a nucleus). Probly only on metals. Or possibly on any conductor.
If an electon jumps off a surface it becomes a free photon.
If an electon jumps off a surface onto a nucleus then it becomes an orbiting electon. I wrongly called it an orbiting photon before, which it is (ie electons are photons).
There is no such thing as an orbiting electron.
Volts & Amperes are due to my electons.
However, i am ok with 3 kinds of electricity on/in a wire.
My electons.
Free electrons moving along outside a surface (wire).
Free electrons moving along inside a wire.
They might all contribute to Voltage & Amperage.
U should read the papers by Forrest Bishop, re V & I.
And read the stuff by Ivor Catt.
However, neither Forrest nor Ivor mention my electons.
--- End quote ---
I see you are the version of flat earthers. I had the correct idea about you initially but just wanted to make sure.
--- End quote ---
Flat Earthers would like my new (electon) electricity i think.
But i don’t know what makes a Flat Earther tick.
Probly a mental disorder.
In the beginning everyone was a Flat Earther -- now dwindling -- & near the end there will be just one.
Electonists are the opposite – we have one at present (me) – but praps near the end everyone will be an electonist.
rfeecs:
--- Quote from: electrodacus on June 28, 2022, 07:58:37 pm ---
--- Quote from: Alex Eisenhut on June 28, 2022, 06:28:48 pm ---
How does an antenna get energy to couple to the receiver?
--- End quote ---
Transmitter antenna is one plate of the capacitor and the receiver is the the other plate of the same capacitor.
--- End quote ---
This is just plain wrong.
Look up near field and far field:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field
--- Quote ---Far-field E (electric) and B (magnetic) field strength decreases as the distance from the source increases, resulting in an inverse-square law for the radiated power intensity of electromagnetic radiation. By contrast, near-field E and B strength decrease more rapidly with distance: the radiative field decreases by the inverse-distance squared, the reactive field by an inverse-cube law, resulting in a diminished power in the parts of the electric field by an inverse fourth-power and sixth-power, respectively. The rapid drop in power contained in the near-field ensures that effects due to the near-field essentially vanish a few wavelengths away from the radiating part of the antenna.
--- End quote ---
The field in and around a capacitor is near field. That's not how energy is coupled from transmitter to receiver.
Based on your previous posts, you don't seem to believe that radio waves are electromagnetic radiation.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version