I know that very well. I had to deal with dial-in quite long. Still, LEO internet satellites can't solve the last mile problem for all the consumers, it's a niche application. Providing internet access to lots of consumers requires a massively scalable network design. Otherwise you end up with huge CAPEX and OPEX and also with rebuilding your network from scratch every few years while burning a lot of money. If you have telephone lines you deploy DSLAMs (up to about 50-250Mbit/s per subscriber), in case of cable TV CMTS' (up to about 400Mbits per subscriber), FTTH (GPON with up to 1Gbit/s per subscriber) or maybe 4G/5G mobile technology. They all have one very important thing in common: they are scalable. For more subscribers add more linecards or boxes, for more throughput add more fibers. If a new standard emerges replace old boxes with new ones. Back to the idea of LEO internet satellites. One satellite will handle maybe an aggregated throughput of 1Gbit/s, providing 10 subscribers with 100Mbit/s or 100 subscribers with 10Mbit/s downstream. How do we get the 1Gbit/s for each satellite to the correct satellite? Don't forget, LEO satellites won't stay in an area for too long. A: Lot's of uplink sites. And what about the subscriber? Will a US$30 box do the job? No, he needs a transceiver with antenna,. A bit expensive and not plug-n-play. And he will also have fun with rain, snow, fog, ice and what have you. How do you handle technology upgrades? You can't simply send a field engineer with a new box to a satellite. Deploying 8000 "Next Generation" satellites? Maybe you start understanding that the idea of internet satellites isn't feasible because of the lack of scalability.