| General > General Technical Chat |
| Elon Musk is a nice chap |
| << < (266/312) > >> |
| james_s:
--- Quote from: Ed.Kloonk on December 18, 2022, 03:10:40 am ---Except that there are a number of certain people that does not apply to and are exempt from freely being followed. And if someone did try, they'd be stitched up pretty quickly. Rules for them.. --- End quote --- Like who? |
| RJSV:
Uhh, NO ! Let's try, a walk through Shakespeare:...whose famous quote applies here: "Me thinks he doth protest too much...". That's a remark sussing out some speaker, who is disingenuously pretending both ignorance (mildly), and shock / protest. Pretending that info enabling stalking is 'harmless' speculation. Try using that one on Pelosi; whose husband suffered a brutal home attack. That, is where the hipocracy starts in, scientifically-wise,...when try switching the players around, watching the reactions change: Try reversing things, regarding that horrible personal hammer assault, attack. Try saying (for pointing out hypocrisy) say " Well, Pelosi chose to be in public spotlight, so...(shoulda been more careful). THAT is disingenuous! Had to look it up in dictionary... Just recent 'survey', here,, sample reading: (Musk) "Lost it, again...", "Rage quit...", Making "bizarre claims", "No evidence...", events are connected "Psychiatric Condition...", "Musk is losing himself...", "...making more unhinged claims...", After, like, 37 piles, one does start to appreciate that Shakespeare comment. "Me thinks he doth pile on smears, too much...", (Ok I wrote that)... |
| TimFox:
Shakespeare: The actual line from Hamlet (act 3, scene 2) is "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." That is the original meaning of "protest", meaning to declare solemnly or avow, not to deny or object. |
| RJSV:
Tim, thanks, but does that mean: The lady keeps asserting loyalty, too much ? I'll look that up, interesting take. |
| vk6zgo:
--- Quote from: RJHayward on December 18, 2022, 01:26:07 am ---Vk, you just made my point right there! Thank you. All your opponents, are crazy. That's a pretty lame defense, ... --- End quote --- No, R.J, your longer posts become incoherent, so the perhaps quite reasonable argument is lost in the noise. Your shorter ones are quite intelligible, but only serve to advance the argument that those who have failed to find their way through the mass of verbiage are willfully dismissing the long posts because of some political agenda. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |