| General > General Technical Chat |
| F35 jet has crashed into the sea...why? |
| << < (10/26) > >> |
| coppercone2:
sounds like they need a check list in the form of a deck tarp that they throw everything that should not be on the plane on and inventory prior to take off. thats a good construction site method if no one steals, but since its a ship no one can steal too well. Or just a wheeled box if the parts are small enough. like a mail cart |
| Bud:
The article says the pilot walks round after the ground crew finished preparations. How come the pilot did not see the cover not removed, unless he did not execute that procedural control. |
| coppercone2:
the problem is they make someone walk (doing something), they need to pile it in the middle and make him look at it without the walking. they might actually comply with that. I don't think they can effectively make someone actually walk around and look, given my understanding of humans, but it is possible to compromise, hence the tarp method. Its essentially asking less of someones brain, and also applying a contrast for quick counting. |
| xrunner:
The procedures for launching jets from boats has been around for many decades. It's all been figured out and trained for - every detail. If this is the cause, it is a lack of attention. Human error. |
| dietert1:
A military airplane that is best kept dry. Might be another parallel to the Starfighter i mentioned above, besides the one engine design and besides the Lockheed origin. If the Daily Mail report is about correct, the accident is completely ridiculous. Nothing went bad or amiss, but some excess part.. Regards, Dieter |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |