No it is not.
Fact, and I don't need this to be "verified" or "confirmed".
Again, this is fact, as arrogant as it may sound.
Film vs digital is same kind of discussion as vinyl vs digital.
Analog is not better. By any metric, including aesteathical "feel".
It is so inferior, technically, that it has specific sound (or look), it is audibly (visibly) inferior.
It is literally so bad you can hear the difference.
It is only that people are used to hear Beatles sound as it were, and that became part of experience. All else sound wrong.
That is why I generally hate remakes of songs and movies. They just seem wrong, just because they are not originals. Even when made really well. Sometimes even better.
That can be heard with authors that are active for long times, like Stevie Wonder. His old recordings, and new ones have way different sound and mastering. And they all sound perfect for what they are, including newer ones that are fully digital, microphone to loudspeaker...........
Old movie people are just nostalgic about film.
New kids nowadays don't give a f**k about vinyl, or film..