cimmo, your views have been well documented in this thread, and are starting to go off topic.
Ah, another one who wants to control the discussion.
Nope, not your forum.
All I am doing is putting some perspective in to this discussion - when other posters say uninformed rubbish like "this accident wouldn't have happened if the Tesla driver was paying attention" which completely ignores the elephant in the room - the truck driver's actions (and apparent lying after the event - which most people seem to take on face value - especially if the media reports it as "fact"), then I will correct those flawed characterisations of this event.
Then I have some clowns trying desperately to find some reason why the truck driver was as innocent as the falling snow.
Why should I let those opinions go unchallenged?
Those other posters were just as "off topic" as I, so as the self declared forum cop, why did you remain silent then?
Also, when another poster declares that there is a LAW that enables a truck to do as this truck did, should I take that as granted, or am I permitted to ask for documentary evidence of this alleged "law"?
Apparently almost everyone here is quite OK with literal shitposts like "Elon Musk is a PIECE OF SHIT!"
Why did YOU let that slide?
I am not the one advocating that the rule of law is optional, I'm not the one advocating that the biggest and deadliest vehicles on the road AUTOMATICALLY have the right of way and I'm not the one saying threatening and anarchic rubbish like "yield or die" (if that poster drives a truck with an attitude like that, he needs to have his heavy vehicle licence revoked).
But apparently, you don't care when other people on this very thread want the public roads to resemble the set of a Mad Max movie.
Anyway, since there ARE some people on this thread who will need to assuage their bruised ego by having the last word, I shall leave this thread so that these other off-topic snarks, ad-homs and probable insults can happen uncontested, but I will leave with these final comments -
The fact of the matter is that this crash was NOT caused by the Tesla, it's systems or the Tesla driver (or even that piece of shit, Elon Musk). Those factors may have been contributory - maybe not, but we simply do not know how close the Tesla was to the truck when the truck commenced the turn, nor how fast the truck was going when it commenced its turn and therefore we do not know how much time was available to the Tesla's driver or its automatic systems to avoid or reduce the inevitable. I can fully visualise a nearly identical scenario involving some mundane car being driven the old fashioned way (and quite possibly at a much higher speed than the Tesla, since the Tesla is not capable of significant speeding in autopilot) resulting in an identical outcome.
Or probably a lot worse.And for all we actually know about all those distances and timings I have just mentioned, even a perfectly operating self-driving car (without the sensor/software limitations of the current Tesla) could still have impacted this truck with enough speed to result in the death of the occupants. Perhaps slightly slower - but is severity of death a criterion worth measuring?
No, we do not need to have automatic cars be able to (magically?) avoid edge case scenarios like this - we need automatic TRUCKS to prevent scenarios like this. Prevention is always better than a cure. The sooner that obviously overworked and underpaid poor diddum truckers are put off the road and replaced by machines that are programmed to follow the rules - the better. Especially owner drivers (such as the driver of this truck) who have a documented history of bending or flat out ignoring the rules because they 'need' to. But apparently having that opinion makes me a 'trucker hater'.
If truckers (such as Mr Baressi) insist on driving like entitled arseholes, then they deserve the hate - and need to be replaced with tech that knows the road rules and is programmed to adhere to them - even if this means the robo-truck has to wait all day until the road is clear of traffic that has the right of way.