I've been advocating hydrogen gas for this sort of unmanned stuff for a long time but few seem to care. IMHO it is a terrible waste of precious helium to lift balloons outdoors. Hydrogen is cheaper, readily available, 100% renewable and offers greater lifting capacity. The fact that it is extremely flammable is only a concern when it is used in close proximity to people or used to lift a manned craft.
Well, that depends a lot on the mission too. There is a big difference whether your HAM radio tracker falls out of the sky because the gas has exploded (e.g. due to a static electricity buildup somewhere) or a large cargo craft costing millions blows up and possibly kills someone on the ground or starts a major fire where the burning bits rain down.
Most of these helium applications fall exactly into those two categories "close to the people" (party balloons or weather probes while being filled, for ex) or too big/expensive to crash land should anything go wrong.
It really isn't about manned craft - which are, in fact, very rare nowadays, only a handful of Zeppelin NTs are flying, because these things are useless as transports (only used for very expensive tourist sightseeing flights) and their use for photography/surveillance has been replaced by much cheaper drones. If hydrogen was safe for such use, it would have been used already, given the difference in price (hydrogen is about 2.5x-3x cheaper than helium).