| General > General Technical Chat |
| Force multiplier |
| << < (62/71) > >> |
| james_s:
The only thing he's on a mission to do is waste people's time, and/or generate traffic to his website. He's either a troll or a fool, either way it is totally pointless to engage. You'd have better luck convincing a rock that it is wrong. |
| electrodacus:
--- Quote from: PlainName on February 13, 2023, 08:04:45 pm ---Again, why does it matter? Both vehicles move to the right when the paper (treadmill) moves to the left. That's all that matters - they aren't going to suddenly backtrack all the way and then continue to the left, are they? Indeed, when the paper stops moving nothing happens at all. If there were any energy storage, where did it go? So your prediction and contention that they cannot move to the right (due to whatever magical thing) is obviously wrong, isn't it? --- End quote --- It matters to understand why it moves to the right to be able to make almost any prediction about the way the mechanism moves and how much energy it needs to do so. Why are you not answering the problem with 4 possible answers? If you think none of those is correct then please add the correct one. Until you make a prediction based on your model of this should work I can not show you the proof to the contrary. There is nothing any of you said other than Kinematics and some force amplification. None of this can be used to correctly answer correctly my last question so it may be the key to understand what I'm unsuccessfully trying to explain. |
| electrodacus:
--- Quote from: james_s on February 13, 2023, 08:17:45 pm ---The only thing he's on a mission to do is waste people's time, and/or generate traffic to his website. He's either a troll or a fool, either way it is totally pointless to engage. You'd have better luck convincing a rock that it is wrong. --- End quote --- Question if for anyone reading this not limited to James. Solve the problem below and if you select the correct answer you will basically admit that my explanation of how this mechanism works is correct or if you answer wrong I can demonstrate that is wrong. Vehicle in case (a) has the output wheel (left wheel) on a slippery surface say ice while input wheel (right wheel) has excellent grip on the treadmill. Vehicle start as stationary and the treadmill is turned ON Question is what will happen with the vehicle ? a) Will wheels just spin with vehicle not going anywhere. b) Will wheels spin and vehicle will also be accelerated to the left. c) Will wheels spin and vehicle will be accelerated to the right. d) Will wheels not spin and vehicle be accelerated to the left. Explain also why will wheel's spin or not speed depending on the prediction you made. |
| PlainName:
--- Quote ---Why are you not answering the problem with 4 possible answers? --- End quote --- Forgotten what the questions relate to, and frankly can't be arsed to waste any time or effort explaining when you'll just move the goalposts yet again. How about you deal with the proofs you've been ignoring? NomAm put a lot of effort into not only showing you how and why, but even detailing how you can do it yourself as well. To what effect? You've just posted your irrelevant questions and demand answers to them. So, no. Before your can expect answers to your questions, you can start by dealing with this very good video, that someone has spent time and effort entirely on your behalf and to your whims. That is showing exactly what you originally said couldn't happen. There is no stretch, slip, nothing. It works exactly as everyone else said it would, and precisely according to the formulae that NomAm kindly worked out and posted. There couldn't be better proof that you are wrong, but you ignore it anyway and make nonsensical demands. |
| electrodacus:
--- Quote from: PlainName on February 13, 2023, 08:38:14 pm --- --- Quote ---Why are you not answering the problem with 4 possible answers? --- End quote --- Forgotten what the questions relate to, and frankly can't be arsed to waste any time or effort explaining when you'll just move the goalposts yet again. How about you deal with the proofs you've been ignoring? NomAm put a lot of effort into not only showing you how and why, but even detailing how you can do it yourself as well. To what effect? You've just posted your irrelevant questions and demand answers to them. So, no. Before your can expect answers to your questions, you can start by dealing with this very good video, that someone has spent time and effort entirely on your behalf and to your whims. That is showing exactly what you originally said couldn't happen. There is no stretch, slip, nothing. It works exactly as everyone else said it would, and precisely according to the formulae that NomAm kindly worked out and posted. There couldn't be better proof that you are wrong, but you ignore it anyway and make nonsensical demands. --- End quote --- The video does not show anything different from what my theory predicts but it is also no useful in proving my theory as both the frame rate and angle at which it is filmed prevents showing the charge discharge cycles. Those can be see way better in my videos. I do not think my problem takes long to answer if you claim you know how the vehicle works and all you need to do is say a letter corresponding to the correct answer and worst case if none of those 4 are the correct answer (not sure what other option can there be) then you add a short phrase as the correct answer. My guess is that you do not know how to answer that thus try and avoid it. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |