General > General Technical Chat
Fusion record - 59 megajoules (MJ) of fusion energy over 5 seconds
(1/3) > >>
perdrix:
https://physicsworld.com/a/fusion-energy-record-smashed-by-joint-european-torus-facility/

There's hope yet - though it's probably still 20 years away!

David
Gyro:
A discussion is already underway...

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/renewable-energy/no-need-for-solar-panels-china-is-doing-what-americas-and-europeans-havent/msg3996251/#msg3996251


 EDIT: Well it managed to stick to the JET Fusion update for a couple of pages - it's wondered off into the familiar Fission versus Fossil debate again now, as these things usually do!   :)
SiliconWizard:
While it is a "milestone", we need of course to put it in perspective:

--- Quote ---The 11 MW produced (with 40 MW of input power) is lower than that achieved in 1997, resulting in a ratio of fusion power to heating power of about 0.3. However, the power was sustained over a longer period of five seconds. Indeed, officials say that they now want to focus on producing “sustained” fusion energy rather than optimising a brief peak performance.
--- End quote ---

"Mastering" fusion on Earth is an impressive achievement in itself, but it's nowhere near practical for actually producing energy, since it takes in a lot more power than it puts out.

As to tritium, while it is what's being used currently, I don't think that's where we're really headed. They are looking at using Helium 3 from what I gathered, which is sort of "abundant" on the Moon, and one of the main reasons there is a "sudden" renewed interest in going to the Moon and installing bases on it. I have no clue (not my area) whether fusion with Helium 3 is at all doable with current, or foreseeable technology.
Kleinstein:
It would be very odd if there is abundant helium on the moon and helium-3 is usually only a very small part of it. No way the helium would stay there unless in a steel bottle.

He-3 is generated when tritium decays - so like tritium is one of the very expensive and rare materials. Compared to this gold is really cheap.
Out of deparation one may go to also "burn" some He-3, as some tritium will decay before it can be captured and thus would come out as a kind of waste at a small rate.
Fusion with He3 would need mode power to start and AFAIK has less neutron radiation.
SiliconWizard:
It is not odd. I put "abundant" in quotes on purpose. While there's not much, it's estimated to be about 3 orders of magnitude more than on Earth.

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Space_for_Earth/Energy/Helium-3_mining_on_the_lunar_surface
https://asiatimes.com/2021/11/helium-3-the-secret-mining-war-in-space/

While not everyone agrees on that being practical at all, both China and Russia definitely have lunar programs that include mining He-3, while apparently the US and Europe do not show much interest, but as China an Russia progress, we'll eventually want to beat them to it.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod