Author Topic: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts  (Read 2570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 1980s_johnTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« on: January 18, 2017, 05:35:22 pm »
BBC news story regarding failure of 9 clocks out of 18 Galileo satellites:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38664225

A bit tricky to get them back to the bench  :-[

Regards,
John
« Last Edit: January 18, 2017, 05:37:05 pm by 1980s_john »
 
The following users thanked this post: Koen

Offline Towger

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1646
  • Country: ie
Re: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2017, 04:04:18 pm »
I wonder if they used the same suppliers as our fellow forum members who sourced their rubidium clocks on eBay from China
 

Offline Vtile

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Country: fi
  • Ingineer
Re: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2017, 04:15:58 pm »
Rohs comliance issue of Yorope? I mean the tin whiskers and all that self coused exotic stuff.
"Traditionally, lead was added to slow down whisker growth in tin-based solders."
« Last Edit: January 20, 2017, 04:25:16 pm by Vtile »
 

Offline Vgkid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2727
  • Country: us
Re: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2017, 05:53:50 pm »
Rohs comliance issue of Yorope? I mean the tin whiskers and all that self coused exotic stuff.
"Traditionally, lead was added to slow down whisker growth in tin-based solders."
I have read somewhere that anything safety qualified(especially Aerospace) is exempt from ROHS.
If you own any North Hills Electronics gear, message me. L&N Fan
 

Online Monkeh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8102
  • Country: gb
Re: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2017, 05:56:54 pm »
Hazardous substances aren't really a concern for something which goes up and stays up.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16384
  • Country: za
Re: Galileo satellite clock failures - one for the time nuts
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2017, 08:34:18 pm »
Hazardous substances aren't really a concern for something which goes up and stays up.

They do come down, but mostly as lots of very small well cooked pieces, and with 78% of the planet being water, there is little chance of them landing on land, and even less of them landing on habitable land. Of course most of the time they are controlled deorbits over the Pacific, but those that have sudden failures in either attitude control, power control or housekeeping tend to be those that do the dice roll of where they will impact.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf