Aaannnd - were back to the climate science denial trolling.
Honestly, Zapta, I'm starting to wonder if you're being paid for these posts since you constantly start threads or interject the same agenda into so many threads. And spare me the ad hominem cliche - this road has been traveled way too many times. Do we really need another climate change thread?.
FWIW -
Curry endorses the scientific consensus on AGW. She is an honest scientist who rightly prods the climate science establishment to be careful in how they present the evidence and the uncertainties. It's unfortunate that this is then used for political propaganda purposes.
You still haven't explained why you misrepresented the facts in your OP.
I gotta hand it to you though - this thread was pure genius. Find a paper that links feminism nonsense (a well known EEVBlog punching bag) to glaciers and climate science to suck in the masses to your climate change denial nonsense - which was your agenda all along. Kind of like offering free beer and food to get people to show up for a religious revival. Well done!
The feminism nonsense is great fun to poke fun at and I'm as disgusted by some of the extremes as the next guy, but it's not much of a fair fight on a forum full of (mostly) male engineers.
I like Stonent's joke about glaciers and feminist though. The problem is feminists generally don't have much of a sense of humor.
Question: How many militant feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?
Answer: That's not funny!