Yes, the "good" probably outweighs the "ill" for most users.
I have heard of divorce attorneys subpoenaing the information to see who visits the user, but catching porch thieves and other miscreants is a good thing.
I failed to see the "good" in having unlimited ability to monitor and intrude into another person's life.
1984 is here, just a few decades late but a few orders of magnitude more intrusive. The Stasi would have been envious of our technological accomplishments.
Same opinion.
I fail to see how the good really outweighs the bad. I think that's really something we all need to seriously ponder on. Claiming it's mostly all good, without really giving it much thought, is what makes it so easy to get us to a place we won't want to be - but it'll be too late.
But dedicated wireless access, while they pose issues of their own, is not nearly as bad as internet connection. (Granted, often "connected" devices have both anyway...)
Seriously. For light bulbs, having a remote can be handy - although absolutely not indispensable - but having them connected to the internet? Fuck no. Why would I want to go through Google servers (for instance with all the Google home crap), and have them log everything I do with my freaking bulbs, just to switch them off and on or change colors? Have we sunk that low?