General > General Technical Chat
H5N1 bird flu and how we're risking another global pandemic
nctnico:
--- Quote from: NiHaoMike on May 05, 2024, 12:09:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: fred001 on May 05, 2024, 04:59:53 am ---Free range farming allows viruses to move back and forth easily between factory farms and wild birds
--- End quote ---
Viruses spread a lot easier if the animals are kept unnaturally close together. And that the poor health of the animals makes them more vulnerable to disease in the first place.
--- End quote ---
Poor health is not the case. The idea that factory farmed animals are mostly sick isn't true. If they where all sick, the farmer wouldn't make a profit as only healthy animals are allowed into the human food chain. I have a bit of background knowledge where it comes to chicken farming and slaughtering chickens.
There is just no way around keeping animals close together in order to farm these in a commercially viable way to meet demand. And for a lot of animals it is not unnatural to be close together. Cows, sheep, gees, chickens, horses, etc are all animals who naturally live in herds. Herds provide protection against predators.
NiHaoMike:
--- Quote from: nctnico on May 05, 2024, 03:23:53 pm ---Poor health is not the case. The idea that factory farmed animals are mostly sick isn't true. If they where all sick, the farmer wouldn't make a profit as only healthy animals are allowed into the human food chain. I have a bit of background knowledge where it comes to chicken farming and slaughtering chickens.
--- End quote ---
All the pictures of factory farms being as dirty as a sewer says otherwise. Maybe it's better in some countries than others, the US is one where regulations are too lax.
Zero999:
--- Quote from: Simon on May 05, 2024, 06:59:52 am ---
--- Quote from: Zero999 on May 03, 2024, 05:20:10 pm ---
--- Quote from: Simon on April 30, 2024, 06:16:38 pm ---
--- Quote from: Zero999 on April 30, 2024, 07:35:10 am ---
Then there's all the other misinformation exaggerating the efficacy of masks, keeping 2m apart etc. which lacked rigorous evidence to support and the authoritarian policies copied from Communist China. It appears as though the public health authorities did their level best to destroy their reputation.
--- End quote ---
And what proof is there that distancing does not work?
--- End quote ---
It isn't. I didn't say that it's proof that masks and keeping 2m apart don't work, just that there's no strong evidence they do. The Cochrane review into masking found it to be inconclusive and as far as I'm aware no studies have been conducted into whether keeping 2m apart does anything to reduce the spread or not. And why 2m? Perhaps 1m would have done? Or maybe we needed to keep 3m or 5m apart? Where's the evidence?
It would be different if we were just advised to wear masks and keep 2m apart. That wouldn't have been ideal, given the lack of evidence, but the fact we were forced to, under pain of a fine, is disgusting. If the authorities are going to punish people for breaking rules, then there needs to be extremely strong evidence to support them in the first place.
--- End quote ---
Both distancing and masks rely on basic physics! You want a study? go an throw some tennis balls and notice that the further they go the closer to the ground they get. And that if you through them as several layers of nets they will no go nearly as far. What you are asking for in the equivalent to arguing about the distance to the moon because a tape measure was not used.
--- End quote ---
But actual field studies, conducted in real life have failed to show masking actually works in practice. Fair enough, it doesn't prove a negative, but it certainly doesn't prove positive either.
The Cochrane review even looked at N95/P2 respirators.
https://www.cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses
Perhaps mask work, when worn properly? It doesn't matter, the fact not enough people wear them properly in real life to be effective, shows that the mandates lacked evidence.
Many failed medications and interventions have good science behind them.
Given most proposed medical interventions, even those with sound theory, don't work, it's reasonable to believe something doesn't work, until there's solid proof it does.
--- Quote from: nctnico on May 03, 2024, 08:53:24 pm ---
--- Quote from: coppice on May 03, 2024, 02:16:01 pm ---Do you realise that if you keep taking a vaccine you loose immunity to the disease it is for?
--- End quote ---
:palm: FFS It is exactly the other way around! Vaccines train your immune system against virusses. For mutating virusses, you'll need regular updates to stay current. It is like airplane pilots taking courses in a simulator to learn what to do in an emergency situation for a different airplane.
--- End quote ---
Repeat infections will do the same.
As I stated in another post, the risk of some adverse events due to the vaccine might higher than the virus for some people, so it makes no sense for them to get vaccinated.
If you've had COVID once and survived, you're much less likely to get really sick if you catch it again. This is also because the virus is mutating to become less deadly, as well as memory T-cells.
--- Quote from: Halcyon on May 04, 2024, 08:08:14 am ---
--- Quote from: AVGresponding on May 04, 2024, 07:15:26 am ---
--- Quote from: Halcyon on May 04, 2024, 02:57:16 am ---
--- Quote from: Wallace Gasiewicz on May 04, 2024, 01:34:53 am ---There arge instances of immunization not working as intended and causing untoward reactions when the patient gets infected. Past RSV immunizations are an example.
--- End quote ---
No one is disputing that a small number of people will have adverse reactions. It does happen. But rather, for the vast majority of the population (i.e.: almost everyone), it has a positive impact overall.
--- End quote ---
You're wasting your time; in the words of Simon and Garfunkel, "The man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest".
This is why I don't participate in these types of thread, they just attract the conspiracy nuts, and others, all of whom have apparently zero understanding of epidemiology, or statisitics and how to interpret them.
--- End quote ---
Sure, but my aim isn't to change the minds of those who are set in their ways, rather try to educate those who are willing to listen and consider facts from different sources. If we let the conspiracies run wild, there would be nothing other than "vaccines are poison" and "5G activates the nano-robots".
But yes you're right, these types of threads generally have a finite life, after which it just becomes utter chaos.
--- End quote ---
Except being sceptical of COVID and seasonal influenza boosters is not a fringe position, based on conspiracy theories. I don't appeal to authority so won't post any names, but there are plenty of highly esteemed medical experts who are respiratory virus/mRNA vaccine septics.
The fact I've changed my position on this, shows I'm open to accepting new ideas and evidence.
I supported the first two doses of the vaccine, especially for older, more vulnerable people, when the virus was more deadly and fewer people had natural immunity.
I became sceptical when the boosters started. There simply isn't randomised data to support it.
Not taking natural immunity into account was also a big mistake. When the vaccine was initially rolled-out, no attention to natural immunity was paid. A 60 year old who had had a positive test result a month ago, was still vaccinated before a 50 year old who had not had a known infection.
A lot of misinformation was pushed about antibodies, i.e. that someone who had been infected while ago and their antibodies had dropped below a detectable level, was just as vulnerable to getting really sick, as the first time, if they caught it again, but this is not the case. Memory T-cells are the key to lasting protection against severe disease. They persist in the bone marrow for decades and enable the body to rapidly generate antibodies, when it encounters a similar virus. This will provide some protection against severe disease and death, even if the virus has mutated a bit and isn't exactly the same, due to cross-immunity.
People who were infected with the original SARS still had memory T-cells over a decade later. Although it's not proven, they would be much less likely become just as sick, if they were exposed to the virus again.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7115611/
coppice:
--- Quote from: Simon on May 05, 2024, 06:59:52 am ---
--- Quote from: Zero999 on May 03, 2024, 05:20:10 pm ---It would be different if we were just advised to wear masks and keep 2m apart. That wouldn't have been ideal, given the lack of evidence, but the fact we were forced to, under pain of a fine, is disgusting. If the authorities are going to punish people for breaking rules, then there needs to be extremely strong evidence to support them in the first place.
--- End quote ---
Both distancing and masks rely on basic physics! You want a study? go an throw some tennis balls and notice that the further they go the closer to the ground they get. And that if you through them as several layers of nets they will no go nearly as far. What you are asking for in the equivalent to arguing about the distance to the moon because a tape measure was not used.
--- End quote ---
This is a ludicrous argument. Certainly sufficient distance will isolated you. Certainly a sufficiently effective mask will protect you. The few long term studies that existed at the outset of COVID said 2m separation for respiratory viruses was far too small to have a meaningful effect, and public policy had always followed that. Long term studies also indicated that simple cloth masks were never seen to be beneficial, and buildups on them seemed to often have a negative effect with respiratory viruses. I do agree that for the next epidemic of tennis balls, their flight path will be a lot more predictable than a COVID virus, as tennis balls aren't affected much by air currents.
EEVblog:
What does this even remotely have to do with electronics at all?
Thread locked.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version