General > General Technical Chat

Hard Disk Storage 1985

<< < (16/18) > >>

rsjsouza:

--- Quote from: AaronLee on October 06, 2021, 12:44:37 am ---
--- Quote from: james_s on October 06, 2021, 12:06:33 am ---
--- Quote from: AaronLee on October 06, 2021, 12:02:14 am ---And he also once said something to the effect that nobody would ever need a smartphone with a screen larger than 3.5" and that is was the perfect size. I laughed so hard when I heard that, at that time, because it made me realize how completely foolish he'd become, into thinking so narrowly that his personal view of a product was the only view. If there were a lot of people that also held his view, or a lot of people who didn't, but could be convinced to change their view to his view, then Apple could sell a lot of their products. But they could have sold a whole lot more if they (Steve Jobs) didn't have such a narrow view of the market for their products. The current management at Apple seems to be catching on to that point, whereas Steve Jobs never did.

--- End quote ---

I actually agree with him on that. Maybe not the part that nobody will ever need a larger screen, but it is the perfect size. I really hate the giant phones and "phablets" (*cringe*) that have been all the rage for years. I got my first iphone specifically because it was the only decent small smartphone I could find, and I got my SE for the same reason. I really do not understand the appeal of gigantic phones at all, I have laptops and tablets for when I want something larger, a phone is a pocket sized communication device that I always have on me, as long as it's large enough to type a text on, the smaller the better.

If they want to make bigger ones for people that desire those, great, but I really hope they keep offering something compact and support it well. Already I sometimes find apps that don't work right on it because needed buttons are off the edge of the screen.

--- End quote ---

It all comes down to each individual's use case, preferences, etc. Some people have bad eyes, and small fonts on a small screen simply won't work. Some people, even for texting like to see more than just two lines of the text they're replying to and two lines of the text they're typing. That one was one of my huge pet-peeves with those tiny screens, where I'd type a sentence, then go back to proofread it, and need to scroll due to such small screen real estate. The problem is further exasperated due to the need for the on-screen touch keypad, and which is difficult to type for someone with big hands but tiny touch areas, where you're always mistyping the keys next to what you intended. There just isn't enough space on a 3.5" screen for what some people need to be efficient. Of course some people watch videos on their smartphones and want a bigger screen for that (myself not included).

Anyways, as for the device easily fitting inside your pocket, the ability to easily hold the device, and swivel your thumb/fingers around to do the necessary actions, I would tend to agree that 3.5" is at or close to an optimal size. But depending on the app you're using, and how you use it, it might be far from optimal with regard to fitting everything on the screen so that it's easily usable. I agree they should continue to sell the smaller size phones, because for some people, it's exactly what they need. They also need to sell what other people need, which is a much bigger device. And that's my whole point, that Jobs couldn't see what were the needs of anyone beyond his narrow view. It wasn't that his view was bad. His view may have been and still is perfect for some. It's just that it's horrible for others.

--- End quote ---
That is the point; the use of screen realstate is much more limiting depending on the use you give to it. If you do everything on the smartphone, the more the merrier as the soft keyboard is one of the most used and most realstate hungry applet. Not only that, but a significant part of the population uses purses, which reduces the pressure to keep the devices as small as possible. As for me, give me a physical keyboard any day instead of soft keys, but that is long lost in the past.

As a personal communicator and phone, perhaps the 3.5'' (or whereabouts) is the perfect size as the keyboard use is somewhat less intense. As for me, I never liked the candybar form factor that much and preferred a flip form factor, but that is also long lost in the past. Yes, Samsung is coming with foldable screens, but after having kids I don't have the expenditure to be an early adopter anymore...  :-DD

Alex Eisenhut:

--- Quote from: rsjsouza on October 06, 2021, 10:50:08 am ---As a personal communicator and phone, perhaps the 3.5'' (or whereabouts) is the perfect size as the keyboard use is somewhat less intense. As for me, I never liked the candybar form factor that much and preferred a flip form factor, but that is also long lost in the past. Yes, Samsung is coming with foldable screens, but after having kids I don't have the expenditure to be an early adopter anymore...  :-DD

--- End quote ---

You sound like a CommLock man!

David Hess:

--- Quote from: Alex Eisenhut on October 06, 2021, 09:11:53 pm ---You sound like a CommLock man!
--- End quote ---

I got that reference!

VK3DRB:

--- Quote from: RobK_NL on July 04, 2018, 07:52:18 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on July 03, 2018, 04:05:45 pm ---I'm old enough for 8 inch floppies, cassettes as storage and not quite old enough to have to toggle the boot loader in, thank goodness :)
--- End quote ---
In the mid-90's I worked for IBM in the test/repair/refurbishment department for the 3370 series hard disks. These beasties:

The controller for these was one of these big cabinet things and it took an 8" floppy and some toggling to get it up and running.

Mind you, the 3370 series was introduced in 1979 and had a capacity of over 500MB. later models had over 700MB.


--- Quote ---Agree with grey beard icon
--- End quote ---
+1

--- End quote ---

I also worked on them in Australia when I worked at IBM too. I remember there was a problem with stiction, especially if the drives were powered off over a long weekend.

But I go back further than that, to the System/32 HDD. 3.1MB or 5MB HDD that took two blokes to lift and it cost a fortune.

But I go back ever further than that to the Stringy Floppy!!!! I am sure few people here would have ever heard of a stringy floppy.

Alex Eisenhut:

--- Quote from: VK3DRB on October 11, 2021, 12:28:56 pm ---
But I go back ever further than that to the Stringy Floppy!!!! I am sure few people here would have ever heard of a stringy floppy.

--- End quote ---

What? I have one in my closet.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod