| General > General Technical Chat |
| heartbroken that John Clauser seems to have joined climate change denial. |
| << < (9/67) > >> |
| Bud:
Yes yes, and still another lie emerges in the form of Solar Roadways projects, and does not seem to care about your capitslism statement. Any idea why? |
| MT:
--- Quote from: snarkysparky on August 01, 2023, 02:18:44 am ---I don't understand. This man is an intellectual giant in the science community. He has aligned himself with the very unscientific group "co2coalition" Co2 coalition has no credible challenge to anthropomorphic global warming. why would a man with that history of achievement take such a position unless he really believed it to be the truth. I realize this could be a very short thread before it is locked. I ask every participant to just review the facts which are accepted in the scientific community and not go to conspiracy sources. --- End quote --- No wonder you dont understand! :-DD ^-^ It's "Anthropogenic". Better you do your home work first, like understanding Younger Dryas events Holocene maximum, mideval warm periods, short period ice ages, etc , based on ice cores, real science not WEF Schwab man made pseudo religious science crap fraud. |
| tszaboo:
--- Quote from: tom66 on August 01, 2023, 09:59:10 pm ---If this was a grand conspiracy involving science, how does capitalism get involved? Surely it would like to minimise costs and maximise profit, by finding the truth that is being covered up(!), by paying those scientists who go against the grain to produce a detailed thesis on why climate change is not happening? Yet no such "truth" emerges despite the enormous financial benefits. --- End quote --- Are you this naïve? They are getting involved in it, because they can sell the same fuel with higher margin. Everything green is more expensive. The food which is made to barely resemble meat costs more than the actual meat. You know, stuff that the chicken eats costs more than the chicken. Nobody is denying that it's not happening. We are denying the models, because they are flawed. All the IPCC past models have been too hot, and reality was always colder than what they predicted. There were a big scandal about satellite measurements inaccuracies that nobody of the normies heard about. Or you know, they didn't think about you know, the clouds :palm:. And even worse, social media and news is terrible at actually understanding what the models mean. They turn it into headlines to scare you, and by the looks of it, they succeeded. |
| Benta:
|
| thm_w:
--- Quote from: MT on August 01, 2023, 10:37:14 pm ---No wonder you dont understand! :-DD ^-^ It's "Anthropogenic". Better you do your home work first, like understanding Younger Dryas events Holocene maximum, mideval warm periods, short period ice ages, etc , based on ice cores, real science not WEF Schwab man made pseudo religious science crap fraud. --- End quote --- Misleading graphic. https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-what-greenland-ice-cores-say-about-past-and-present-climate-change/ https://skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=337 "Scientists reconstructing past Greenland temperatures now use estimates from many different ice cores, which reduces the uncertainties associated with any single one and gives a more accurate picture of changes over Greenland as a whole." "This modern temperature reconstruction, combined with observational records over the past century, shows that current temperatures in Greenland are warmer than any period in the past 2,000 years. That said, they are likely still cooler than during the early part of the current geological epoch – the Holocene – which started around 11,000 years ago." |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |