Author Topic: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289  (Read 4418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marcel85Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
  • Country: gb
Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« on: January 11, 2013, 01:25:12 am »
Hi all, I am EEE student. Currently I am in the process of setting up my electronic lab. The test instruments which I bought so far are Rigol DS1052E and signal generator Rigol DS1022. As a electrician I was using Fluke 117 so I still have it. I can get the Rigol for £350 what's similar to the Fluke 289. I will be using the DMM mostly behind my bench so space in not an issue.
Do you have any ideas what to chose mostly for an electronic measurements ? or is it better to get old Fluke bench DMM? I can't find any used Agilent in UK for this price range :-//

thank you for your help ;)       
 

Offline Spikee

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 568
  • Country: nl
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2013, 02:00:20 am »
I have the Rigol DM3058 and the pc software is crap .... the meter is nice tho =) .
From the inside the DM3058 5 1/2 digits and the DM3068  6 1/2 digits are the same model , the software is only different.
If you use an external application to read the measurement from the dmm you get the full 6 1/2 digits resolution.

That said ... the fluke 289 is kinda a gimmick , battery life is short , you have to buy the fluke software if you want to do any decent datalogging or other pc related stuff and expensive. For the money the DM3051 is hard to beat in terms of features , price etc...
Freelance electronics design service, Small batch assembly, Firmware / WEB / APP development. In Shenzhen China
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2013, 02:21:06 am »
I'm a huge test equipment junkie myself, but I'd think both are overkill for a student. I do love bench DMMs, whatever Dave may say about them, but new ones are always either very expensive, or somewhat expensive and complete shit. I'd go with a nice new handheld DMM, and maybe an old Fluke or Keithley bench model as well (I have an 8050A and love it). The more the merrier! I'd rather spend money on a few good (even if not great) handheld meters and maybe one old bench meter than one single brand-new meter.

Honestly, for most non-professional-EE purposes, data logging is overrated too. For that one occasion where you need to record, you can always just set a timer or watch a clock and take manual measurements once a minute or whatever.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 38638
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2013, 02:31:33 am »
I do love bench DMMs, whatever Dave may say about them

Here we go again!  :P
The only thing I have against bench DMM's is that I do not find them at all convenient for general use. A meter is infinitely more usable if it can move to were the job is. IMO, a lab that only has bench DMM's is not a properly equipped lab.

In any case, I might be having a bench DMM review soon, but cannot say any more  :-DMM

Dave.
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2013, 02:48:32 am »
IMO, a lab that only has bench DMM's is not a properly equipped lab.

Very true. I find bench meters very convenient, but that's because I'm mostly doing everything in the same spot. No need to drag it around. It's nice that I can just turn it on without draining the battery, no auto shutoff, and it's always right there (I suffer from a mental disorder called "always leaving things where I last used them and completely forgetting to put them away", so anything that never gets moved is good for me  :-+)

Most of the labs at my school are very stupidly equipped. At each station, one overkill oscilloscope (it's an Agilent holy-shit-MHz, four channels plus logic, I've never even seen anyone drag out the logic head, the "good" probes, or more than two probes), then a single ancient Keithley bench DMM (only 2000 count, and like many of the Keithleys, I think it might not even do current), a function generator and an old 1A-max bipolar power supply.  :palm: Take some of the money used on the damn oscilloscopes and give us more DMMs!

One bench DMM: bad. One or more handheld ones: good. One bench DMM in conjunction with handheld ones: better.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline Marcel85Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
  • Country: gb
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2013, 10:53:25 pm »
Thank you all for your responses  ;) it helped a lot
I will stick with the proved Fluke 87V for know. Is it good idea to buy it from USA ? I found one for £250

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/251146206991?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649

Do you know if the parcel will be liable for import taxes?   
 

Offline LaurenceW

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 258
  • Country: gb
    • It's Time, Jim, but not as we know it
Re: Rigol DM3051 or Fluke 289
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2013, 11:00:49 am »
Marcel, any import from the USA WILL be LIABLE for import duties, yes. These could be as much as 20% of the declared value of the item, PLUS an "Administration fee" which the carrier may choose to levy, for the privilege of doing the government's tax collecting duties. That could be GBP £10-20. Having said that, you MIGHT WELL get away without paying anything, but you should factor it into your calculations.

Having said THAT, doesn't this offer from the USA seem a tad TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE? Be aware that Fluke probably wouldn't offer their "lifetime support" (which, granted most of us never need to call upon, anyway), for such "grey" imports.
If you don't measure, you don't get.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf