General > General Technical Chat
How does the electron make a photon in an antenna?
<< < (22/38) > >>
tszaboo:

--- Quote from: Zero999 on February 02, 2023, 09:03:32 pm ---Are you spamming now? I Googled aetherwind and got loads of pictures of this character.

https://www.google.com/search?q=aetherwind&source=lmns&bih=895&biw=1920&client=firefox-b-d&hl=en-GB&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjItqDp3Pf8AhVmhCcCHa_sBhwQ_AUoAHoECAEQAA

--- End quote ---
Wow, 7/7 attack and defense, that is quite a card.
Damn, I  think it has been 20 years since I played magic.
TimFox:
This argument is much like playing chess with a pigeon.
First, the pigeon knocks over all the pieces.
Then, it craps all over the board.
Finally, it flies back to its nest claiming victory.

Attacking Albert Einstein as a person is ad hominem.
aetherist:

--- Quote from: raspberrypi on February 07, 2017, 04:56:41 am ---We know how an electron makes a photon in an LED. It jump from a higher orbital to a lower one emitting a photon. But in an antenna its occupying the same valance just with a different nucleus each hop.  How is the energy transferred to a radio frequency photon?
--- End quote ---
Further to my earlier answers to your question -- re How does the electron make a photon in an antenna?
Electrons dont make electricity on a wire, nor on an antenna.
Electricity on a wire is made by photons (ELEKTONS) hugging the surface of the Cu.
Hence electricity on (u said in but in is wrong, its on) an antenna means that there is already a photon on the antenna.
Hence your question duznt arise in the first place.
However, u are of course actually referring to the radio signal --  u are asking how are the radio signal photons created (ie in the air between the transmitter & receiver).
However, as i explained earlier, radio signals are not photons, they are em radiation.
Hence your question duznt arise in the 2nd place.

Funny that – when we have the correct model & the correct reality lots of questions evaporate.
aetherist:

--- Quote from: TimFox on February 04, 2023, 11:54:47 pm ---This argument is much like playing chess with a pigeon.
First, the pigeon knocks over all the pieces.
Then, it craps all over the board.
Finally, it flies back to its nest claiming victory.

Attacking Albert Einstein as a person is ad hominem.
--- End quote ---
1. Attacking Einstein the person is ad hominem -- but i don’t remember ever attacking Einstein as a person.
2. Your pigeon gedanken is as silly & wrong as Einstein's silly gedankens.
3. U said "this argument"—which argument is that?
AVGresponding:
You should go and write science fiction or fantasy novels. At least there, you aren't required to provide any evidence to back up your ideas.

Here, we do, and you consistently fail to provide any maths for us to examine, or physical experimental set up for us to use to test your ideas. Your ideas, are in fact, self descriptive, in that they are insubstantial and intangible.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod