General > General Technical Chat

How does the electron make a photon in an antenna?

<< < (23/38) > >>

Zero999:

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 05, 2023, 10:24:59 am ---You should go and write science fiction or fantasy novels. At least there, you aren't required to provide any evidence to back up your ideas.

Here, we do, and you consistently fail to provide any maths for us to examine, or physical experimental set up for us to use to test your ideas. Your ideas, are in fact, self descriptive, in that they are insubstantial and intangible.

--- End quote ---
No one would publish him, because his spelling and grammar are abysmal.

iMo:
Our entire known Universe consists of electrons and other particles. Any movement of any electron in the Universe is influencing other electrons in the entire Universe (mind the "entire Universe" used here, as all the existing electrons affect each other).
When you move an electron by 1mm all the electrons in our entire Universe will be affected and they move into a new positions where all the forces among them go to a new equilibrium.
The force an electron affects the others drops with the distance, thus an 1mm movement in your smartphone antenna will affect electrons on the Proxima Centauri a very little, but it will affect them and they will move a little bit.
This way electrons moving up and down (a simplification) in your antenna affect all electrons in the entire Universe, such they move up and down (while looking for the new equilibrium in their position in the field of the Universe).
The propagation speed is the speed of light, as we know it today. For simplicity the "quantum" of the "energy" they "emit towards other electrons" while they moving people call a "photon". Thus "emitting a photon" means the electron has somehow affected other electrons in our entire Universe.
The faster the kick into the electron (ie. the stronger "acceleration"), the more energetic kick to all electrons in our entire Universe will be. Thus we have photons with low energies and photons with large energies.
Not sure we know why the electrons affect each other, as of today, though..

aetherist:

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 05, 2023, 10:24:59 am ---You should go and write science fiction or fantasy novels. At least there, you aren't required to provide any evidence to back up your ideas.
Here, we do, and you consistently fail to provide any maths for us to examine, or physical experimental set up for us to use to test your ideas. Your ideas, are in fact, self descriptive, in that they are insubstantial and intangible.
--- End quote ---
If my ELEKTONS are true then every experiment has tested my ELEKTONS (ie while experimenters were thinking that they were testing some kind of silly electron).

If the maths works for (silly) electrons then it works for my (true) ELEKTONS.
Mass, charge, spin, angular momentum – my ELEKTONS are ok for all the math.

Self descriptive.
What is wrong with my ELEKTON elekticity theory being self descriptive?  – did Einstein write any self descriptive stuff?
Insubstantial -- lacking substance or material nature. : lacking firmness or solidity : flimsy.
My ELEKTON elekticity idea is physical.
Intangible -- incapable of being touched.
My ELEKTONS elekticity idea is tangible – however the (silly) electron electricity idea, being non-true, must fail any tangibility test.

aetherist:

--- Quote from: Zero999 on February 05, 2023, 11:10:01 am ---
--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 05, 2023, 10:24:59 am ---You should go and write science fiction or fantasy novels. At least there, you aren't required to provide any evidence to back up your ideas.

Here, we do, and you consistently fail to provide any maths for us to examine, or physical experimental set up for us to use to test your ideas. Your ideas, are in fact, self descriptive, in that they are insubstantial and intangible.
--- End quote ---
No one would publish him, because his spelling and grammar are abysmal.
--- End quote ---
I will write proper when u learn to pronounce proper.
My grammar is proper.
I accept that my ideas are very deep.

aetherist:

--- Quote from: imo on February 05, 2023, 11:17:24 am ---Our entire known Universe consists of electrons and other particles. Any movement of any electron in the Universe is influencing other electrons in the entire Universe (mind the "entire Universe" used here, as all the existing electrons affect each other).
When you move an electron by 1mm all the electrons in our entire Universe will be affected and they move into a new positions where all the forces among them go to a new equilibrium.
The force an electron affects the others drops with the distance, thus an 1mm movement in your smartphone antenna will affect electrons on the Proxima Centauri a very little, but it will affect them and they will move a little bit.
This way electrons moving up and down (a simplification) in your antenna affect all electrons in the entire Universe, such they move up and down (while looking for the new equilibrium in their position in the field of the Universe).
The propagation speed is the speed of light, as we know it today. For simplicity the "quantum" of the "energy" they "emit towards other electrons" while they moving people call a "photon". Thus "emitting a photon" means the electron has somehow affected other electrons in our entire Universe.
The faster the kick into the electron (ie. the stronger "acceleration"), the more energetic kick to all electrons in our entire Universe will be. Thus we have photons with low energies and photons with large energies.
Not sure we know why the electrons affect each other, as of today, though..
--- End quote ---
Yes we dont know what charge etc is, or what magnetism etc is, or what em radiation is, or what a photon is.
But we know that radio involves em radiation.
And we know that electricity on a wire involves ELEKTONS.
And we know that photons & em radiation (in the far field) propagate at the speed of light.
And we know what gravity is -- & we know that it acts at at least 20 billion c.

Electrons exist, but the silly electrons that supposedly orbit in an atom do not exist – these silly electrons are actually my ELEKTRONS orbiting in the atom.
Atoms are elektric – ie bottled elekticity.

However, it’s a bit rich to talk of a 1mm movement of any charge or particle influencing every other charge or particle in our infinite & eternal universe.
Why not just say that it influences everything in our cosmos, ie in out part of the universe.
Or that it influences everything in our solar system.

U say that all existing electrons affect each other.
This raises some interesting questions.
I think that according to the BB theory the light from some stars has not yet reached some other stars – & i think that furthermore BB theory says that the light from some stars will never reach some other stars – hence your statement duznt accord with BB theory.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod