General > General Technical Chat
How does the electron make a photon in an antenna?
<< < (16/38) > >>
aetherist:

--- Quote from: RJHayward on February 01, 2023, 06:17:00 am ---Predictable.
Wait for somebody (else) to ask why not look up accelerating charge (will radiate), but then you can kick-in the WORD SALAD.
   But you've managed to duck the question, (see my prev post):
   WHAT organized use, or publication, entity, or business are you contemplating?  Because, apparent 'Nobel Prize' self-declarations lead one to assume that you aren't a has-been / never willbe.
Comeon man, I taking the effort, in the face of your word-salading this, the effort to ask.
Or is it just passive jerk-TROLLING. COME ON MAN.
--- End quote ---
My elekton (hugging photon) nature of electricity on a wire (conductor) is definitely worthy of a Nobel [No1] -- i will need to brush up on my Swedish.
My orbiting elektron (non-electron) nature of an atom is worthy of a Nobel [No2] -- u kan get 2 Nobels in the one year if they are in different categories -- that would be a hoot (but more tax).
Nearly forgot -- my em radiation (non-photon) nature of radio waves is worthy of a Nobel [No3] -- probly in a different year (good, less tax)(Swedish tax is a killer).
And all 3 have been mentioned in this one thread.  Without being off topic. And, i have addressed the OP's concerns almost single-handed (ignoring the bad advice of others).
aetherist:

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 01, 2023, 06:27:33 am ---The fact that they describe the nucleus of an atom as "spherical" indicates that they are firmly in the ancient Greek level of understanding of matter. An open admission of not understanding quantum theory is superfluous; it explains everything they are trying to.
QED (in the ancient Latin sense)
--- End quote ---
Personally i prefer the molecular (non-circular) nature of the atomic nucleus (rather than an almost circular conglomeration of protons etc).

But, i doubt that a quantum theory (math) model (of anything) has ever explained the nature of anything (quantum theory is i think not about the how & why).
I  daresay that quantum theory is particularly clueless in describing electricity in antennas, & the radio waves between antennas.

How duz quantum theory account for the fact that electricity along an antenna propagates at 2c/3 km/s if the Cu is insulated?
TimFox:

--- Quote from: aetherist on February 01, 2023, 06:51:16 am ---
--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 01, 2023, 06:27:33 am ---The fact that they describe the nucleus of an atom as "spherical" indicates that they are firmly in the ancient Greek level of understanding of matter. An open admission of not understanding quantum theory is superfluous; it explains everything they are trying to.
QED (in the ancient Latin sense)
--- End quote ---
Personally i prefer the molecular (non-circular) nature of the atomic nucleus (rather than an almost circular conglomeration of protons etc).

But, i doubt that a quantum theory (math) model (of anything) has ever explained the nature of anything (quantum theory is i think not about the how & why).
I  daresay that quantum theory is particularly clueless in describing electricity in antennas, & the radio waves between antennas.

How duz quantum theory account for the fact that electricity along an antenna propagates at 2c/3 km/s if the Cu is insulated?

--- End quote ---

Quantum theory is not necessary to explain simple transmission line theory.  Just look at a catalog from Belden for coaxial cables as a practical example.
How do your electons predict spectroscopy, which was one of the early triumphs of quantum mechanics?
Optical spectroscopy as a measurement technique was well developed before quantum mechanics allowed the wavelengths to be calculated accurately from first principles--not handwaving.
TimFox:

--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 01, 2023, 06:27:33 am ---The fact that they describe the nucleus of an atom as "spherical" indicates that they are firmly in the ancient Greek level of understanding of matter. An open admission of not understanding quantum theory is superfluous; it explains everything they are trying to.

QED (in the ancient Latin sense)

--- End quote ---

Who are "they" that describe the atomic nucleus as spherical?
Nuclear physics has advanced far from the Classic Comics illustrations.
The nuclear shell model of nuclear structure, for which Maria Goeppert Mayer won the Nobel prize in 1963, was developed way back in 1948, and much work has happened since then.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1963/mayer/facts/
AVGresponding:

--- Quote from: TimFox on February 01, 2023, 03:32:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 01, 2023, 06:27:33 am ---The fact that they describe the nucleus of an atom as "spherical" indicates that they are firmly in the ancient Greek level of understanding of matter. An open admission of not understanding quantum theory is superfluous; it explains everything they are trying to.

QED (in the ancient Latin sense)

--- End quote ---

Who are "they" that describe the atomic nucleus as spherical?
Nuclear physics has advanced far from the Classic Comics illustrations.
The nuclear shell model of nuclear structure, for which Maria Goeppert Mayer won the Nobel prize in 1963, was developed way back in 1948, and much work has happened since then.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1963/mayer/facts/


--- End quote ---

You've been arguing with them for several pages. Now I'm wondering if you actually bothered to read any of the drivel they came out with, but here's the quote, with relevant text bolded and underlined:


--- Quote from: aetherist on February 01, 2023, 03:56:18 am ---
--- Quote from: SiliconWizard on February 01, 2023, 03:47:40 am ---Where's the hugging photon?
--- End quote ---
Electricity is the electon, the hugging photon -- confined in 2 dimensions, ie free to roam (straight ahead at all times) on a surface (eg on a Cu wire) -- & when the electon is hugging a nucleus it is still confined in 2 dimensions, ie the surface of a sphere (alltho actually it will be in some kind of fuzzy orbit).

An electon duz a U-turn at the end of a wire -- ie it goes straight ahead -- but the surface does a U-turn (u know what i mean).

--- End quote ---
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod