General > General Technical Chat
How does the electron make a photon in an antenna?
<< < (17/38) > >>
TimFox:
I misunderstood the pronoun you used and thought you were referring to more than one person.
That person still argues against the archaic model of atoms looking like little solar systems.
aetherist:

--- Quote from: TimFox on February 01, 2023, 03:07:23 pm ---
--- Quote from: aetherist on February 01, 2023, 06:51:16 am ---
--- Quote from: AVGresponding on February 01, 2023, 06:27:33 am ---The fact that they describe the nucleus of an atom as "spherical" indicates that they are firmly in the ancient Greek level of understanding of matter. An open admission of not understanding quantum theory is superfluous; it explains everything they are trying to.
QED (in the ancient Latin sense)
--- End quote ---
Personally i prefer the molecular (non-circular) nature of the atomic nucleus (rather than an almost circular conglomeration of protons etc).

But, i doubt that a quantum theory (math) model (of anything) has ever explained the nature of anything (quantum theory is i think not about the how & why).
I  daresay that quantum theory is particularly clueless in describing electricity in antennas, & the radio waves between antennas.

How duz quantum theory account for the fact that electricity along an antenna propagates at 2c/3 km/s if the Cu is insulated?
--- End quote ---
Quantum theory is not necessary to explain simple transmission line theory.  Just look at a catalog from Belden for coaxial cables as a practical example.
How do your electons predict spectroscopy, which was one of the early triumphs of quantum mechanics?
Optical spectroscopy as a measurement technique was well developed before quantum mechanics allowed the wavelengths to be calculated accurately from first principles--not handwaving.
--- End quote ---
I don’t claim that my elekton elekticity is going to change the world (but it might trigger some advances one day).
But apparently according to u (& others) quantum mechanics has changed the world. Rubbish.
Google tells us that we owe lots of certain modern miracles to quantum mechanics. Rubbish.
QEDnuts reckon that the sun shines out of quantum mechanics arse. Rubbish.
Quantum mechanics math is unlikely to have given us anything that could not be or could not have been achieved empirically.
Putting it another way – if quantum mechanics has given us SomeThing that would be impossible to achieve empirically or by some other method then by the same token that there quantum SomeThing is non-provable.

U ask re what prediction(s) follow from my elekton elekticity. Understanding the true nature of electricity must help us one way or another.
The mythology of electron electricity has not much hindered progress. Apparently we simply ignore & work around any problems.
Its difficult to predict what could come out of elekton electricity, even in the electric area -- & any prediction in other areas (eg spectroscopy) are moreso.
Praps elektons will help us at a very micro level one day – eg in electrics in the black box at the rear of a spectrometer.

Elektron elekticity & elektron atoms & photonic radio signals work ok, if u ignore & work around where they dont.
My elekton elekticity & elektron atom & (non-photonic) radio signal will require changes to skoolbooks. 
And quantum mechanics will jump on board & find lots of areas where quantum mechanics can help -- & once again QEDnuts will crow about how the sun shines out of their arse -- & everyone will live happily ever after.
TimFox:
"Electron electricity & electron atoms & photonic radio signals work ok, if u ignore & work around where they dont."

Where don't they work?
They certainly work for transmission lines, antennas, radioactivity, atomic spectroscopy, charged-particle beam accelerators, chemistry, molecular scattering, and a host of other well-studied and understood practical problems.
How would you pitch your proposed theory to, for example Texas Instruments or Intel, to replace their understanding of charge motion in semiconductors?

There are lots of not fully understood issues in the physical universe such as dark matter:  why not apply your endeavours in that direction?
And yes, quantum mechanics did change our understanding of the world around us in many profound ways, yet some people still think that it is icky.
RJSV:
   But, yet again, you've ignored the real question, related to your validity, here.  Put aside the techno-crap you spew, and answer, in straight, organizational, entity oriented language:
   What is your direction, then ?  Publish this, in a blog ?
Is this subject published by you, ANYWHERE else ?
Because, as a person, you look like a paranoid, with quick to defend responses, spewing out that mis-spelled techno-sounding crapola...and never really answering, then, a straight question.
   Straight questions get ignored...until some other post brings up the slightest technology subject; then you are back, in the driver's seat, full speed.
   I'm learning, how to operate, as a paranoid ego, watching your infantile performance.
You, are abusing this forum, but tiny harmless fools persist, comparatively.  At least, learn to spell 'SKOOL'.
(OR go to one.)
Thank you
Zero999:
Photons are emitted in an antenna because charges are accelerating and decelerating, which generates photons. The faster the rate of change in velocity, the higher the energy the photon emitted.

The concept of a photon really only really makes sense at higher frequencies/energies i.e. the shorter infrared wavelengths. At radio frequencies a single photon is such a tiny amount of energy, it's impossible to detect a single photon.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod