| General > General Technical Chat |
| NEW FORUM UPLOAD FEATURES |
| << < (24/32) > >> |
| StillTrying:
--- Quote from: bitseeker on July 18, 2019, 04:07:33 am ---It looks like inline thumbnails are intended to expand in place, but it's failling. --- End quote --- The inline thumbnails taking over the whole page is more of a nuisance than having to have them at the bottom of the text was! |
| tooki:
--- Quote from: StillTrying on July 18, 2019, 10:25:19 am --- --- Quote from: bitseeker on July 18, 2019, 04:07:33 am ---It looks like inline thumbnails are intended to expand in place, but it's failling. --- End quote --- The inline thumbnails taking over the whole page is more of a nuisance than having to have them at the bottom of the text was! --- End quote --- Ummm... what? The thumbnails don’t take over the whole page. Are you referring to the full-size image loading as a new page when clicking an inline thumbnail? |
| StillTrying:
--- Quote from: tooki on July 18, 2019, 06:50:51 pm --- --- Quote from: StillTrying on July 18, 2019, 10:25:19 am ---The inline thumbnails taking over the whole page is more of a nuisance than having to have them at the bottom of the text was! --- End quote --- Ummm... what? The thumbnails don’t take over the whole page. Are you referring to the full-size image loading as a new page when clicking an inline thumbnail? --- End quote --- Yeah, I mean after you've clicked on them to see the full size. :) I thought the idea was to have the new in-text thumbnails expand within the text, depending on the browser's pixel width, something like InLine.jpg. If I click on one of the new in-text thumbnails I get NewInLine.jpg, and then have to use the back button to go back to the text. For me having the expanded image at the bottom/below the thin line was more convenient than the whole new image page version. Of course it could be something I don't know about firefox. |
| tooki:
--- Quote from: StillTrying on July 18, 2019, 09:28:42 pm --- --- Quote from: tooki on July 18, 2019, 06:50:51 pm --- --- Quote from: StillTrying on July 18, 2019, 10:25:19 am ---The inline thumbnails taking over the whole page is more of a nuisance than having to have them at the bottom of the text was! --- End quote --- Ummm... what? The thumbnails don’t take over the whole page. Are you referring to the full-size image loading as a new page when clicking an inline thumbnail? --- End quote --- Yeah, I mean after you've clicked on them to see the full size. :) I thought the idea was to have the new in-text thumbnails expand within the text, depending on the browser's pixel width, something like InLine.jpg. If I click on one of the new in-text thumbnails I get NewInLine.jpg, and then have to use the back button to go back to the text. For me having the expanded image at the bottom/below the thin line was more convenient than the whole new image page version. Of course it could be something I don't know about firefox. --- End quote --- No, it’s not Firefox, it’s the bug I noticed earlier in this thread and which bitseeker just figured out the cause of in his last reply: the in-place image expansion is failing (which is supposed to “catch” the click on the thumbnail — which itself is a link — and expand in place instead of allowing the link to be followed). With the catching failing, the link is being followed and thus loading the image as a new page. |
| bitseeker:
Spot on, tooki. :-+ |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |