General > General Technical Chat
Just because technology can do something, doent meant its always right
<< < (25/43) > >>
ebastler:
Well, the "analog vs. digital photography" part of the debate certainly has audiophoolery potential: The different "feel" of a grainy film image vs. the "cold perfection" of digital images and so on.

We were drifting into that territory for a while, with reference to old filmmakers who can't be wrong and know that "film is always better". But the discussion has moved back into the more well-defined realm of pixel counts and angular resolution of the eye afterwards.
bd139:

--- Quote from: magic on June 21, 2022, 06:34:44 am ---Yes, it's very well defined by "I can clearly see a difference" and "I can clearly prove that you can't" :-DD

--- End quote ---

Give me a double blind test, with text and I will demonstrate by ability to discriminate between different PPI displays perfectly beyond your assumptions.

I actually have done this recently before I spent a kidney on a 5k display.
BrianHG:
There is certainly a difference on good old Protel99SE between a 2k and 4k display.
A huge difference on net label size and fine traces.
tom66:
Vivado (ILA especially) and schematic editing in 4K look great.

I still contend that >= 5K is going to be of little benefit for a PC monitor.
Psi:
One thing to consider is that people are not all the same.
Some people may not see the ocular detail that others can, and if people assume everyone else must 'see' the same as they do, then you will always get pointless arguments.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod