General > General Technical Chat

Just because technology can do something, doent meant its always right

<< < (11/43) > >>

eti:
I’ll leave you to your musings. Maybe you’re right, maybe you’re not and the same to me. Being right is vastly overrated.

bd139:

--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 10:02:50 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:59:41 am ---
--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 09:53:53 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:53:00 am ---You're confusing photographic nostalgia with reality.

--- End quote ---

Prove it.

--- End quote ---

If you take the celebrities and the money points out of your argument it looks like:


--- Quote ---My late friend, Bob, was cameraman for the Joe Bloggses and was friends with Dave from the pub, and did promos for the Stinky Pinks (He lived next door to them) and also The Dumbells.  He worked extensively with the Gordon Bleus, and when he told me something, I’d take his word for it over anyone alive, as he REALLY knew his stuff. He was no “ amateur photographer“, you can Google him if you like.

Film is better. He’s got cans of unseen footage, many many stacks of which I lifted with my own hands when he moved house. Each can was worth a MINIMUM of circa £2 to any number of media outlets, and he had around 200 of them.

I’ll take his word on film being best, apart from it being my own informed view too. Colour range of natural substances cannot be anywhere NEAR “emulated” by pixels.

Google him, he was cleaner for the local council estate, and friends with Bill, Mike, ex boyfriend of Shelley… yes I’m name dropping, because he’s a legend of snuff video production, he KNEW his stuff back from when he began.

Sorry and all that, but he was an authority on film and that’s how I see it. 

--- End quote ---

This is a stream of emotions with nothing factual or relevance in a temporal scale.

--- End quote ---

Facetious mockery doesn’t negate a thing. You lose any credibility automatically from that churlish response.

--- End quote ---

I think that was a fairly accurate response. I completely destroyed your argument because it was emotional namedropping only with nothing factual. If you remove the names and the money there is nothing credible left.

Look in the mirror not throw an insult back.

eti:

--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 10:06:16 am ---
--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 10:02:50 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:59:41 am ---
--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 09:53:53 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:53:00 am ---You're confusing photographic nostalgia with reality.

--- End quote ---

Prove it.

--- End quote ---

If you take the celebrities and the money points out of your argument it looks like:


--- Quote ---My late friend, Bob, was cameraman for the Joe Bloggses and was friends with Dave from the pub, and did promos for the Stinky Pinks (He lived next door to them) and also The Dumbells.  He worked extensively with the Gordon Bleus, and when he told me something, I’d take his word for it over anyone alive, as he REALLY knew his stuff. He was no “ amateur photographer“, you can Google him if you like.

Film is better. He’s got cans of unseen footage, many many stacks of which I lifted with my own hands when he moved house. Each can was worth a MINIMUM of circa £2 to any number of media outlets, and he had around 200 of them.

I’ll take his word on film being best, apart from it being my own informed view too. Colour range of natural substances cannot be anywhere NEAR “emulated” by pixels.

Google him, he was cleaner for the local council estate, and friends with Bill, Mike, ex boyfriend of Shelley… yes I’m name dropping, because he’s a legend of snuff video production, he KNEW his stuff back from when he began.

Sorry and all that, but he was an authority on film and that’s how I see it. 

--- End quote ---

This is a stream of emotions with nothing factual or relevance in a temporal scale.

--- End quote ---

Facetious mockery doesn’t negate a thing. You lose any credibility automatically from that churlish response.

--- End quote ---

I think that was a fairly accurate response. I completely destroyed your argument because it was emotional namedropping only with nothing factual. If you remove the names and the money there is nothing credible left.

Look in the mirror not throw an insult back.

--- End quote ---

Your mindset is that of a competitive child. Which intelligent adult uses such words as “destroyed”? … this isn’t an online computer game. 🤦‍♂️

Okay you win the game. Enjoy!

Ask the Who’s who of pop about Peter, that’s if you know who they are. lol. Enjoy your Sunday.

bd139:

--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 10:07:53 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 10:06:16 am ---
--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 10:02:50 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:59:41 am ---
--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 09:53:53 am ---
--- Quote from: bd139 on June 19, 2022, 09:53:00 am ---You're confusing photographic nostalgia with reality.

--- End quote ---

Prove it.

--- End quote ---

If you take the celebrities and the money points out of your argument it looks like:


--- Quote ---My late friend, Bob, was cameraman for the Joe Bloggses and was friends with Dave from the pub, and did promos for the Stinky Pinks (He lived next door to them) and also The Dumbells.  He worked extensively with the Gordon Bleus, and when he told me something, I’d take his word for it over anyone alive, as he REALLY knew his stuff. He was no “ amateur photographer“, you can Google him if you like.

Film is better. He’s got cans of unseen footage, many many stacks of which I lifted with my own hands when he moved house. Each can was worth a MINIMUM of circa £2 to any number of media outlets, and he had around 200 of them.

I’ll take his word on film being best, apart from it being my own informed view too. Colour range of natural substances cannot be anywhere NEAR “emulated” by pixels.

Google him, he was cleaner for the local council estate, and friends with Bill, Mike, ex boyfriend of Shelley… yes I’m name dropping, because he’s a legend of snuff video production, he KNEW his stuff back from when he began.

Sorry and all that, but he was an authority on film and that’s how I see it. 

--- End quote ---

This is a stream of emotions with nothing factual or relevance in a temporal scale.

--- End quote ---

Facetious mockery doesn’t negate a thing. You lose any credibility automatically from that churlish response.

--- End quote ---

I think that was a fairly accurate response. I completely destroyed your argument because it was emotional namedropping only with nothing factual. If you remove the names and the money there is nothing credible left.

Look in the mirror not throw an insult back.

--- End quote ---

Your mindset is that of a competitive child. Which intelligent adult uses such words as “destroyed”? … this isn’t an online computer game. 🤦‍♂️

--- End quote ---

You're sounding a little bitter. Perhaps utterly defeated is a better synonym.

Ask yourself what the difference between an amateur and a professional photographer is?

One gets paid.

bd139:

--- Quote from: eti on June 19, 2022, 10:12:39 am ---You are referring to my dear friend who died of dementia. If you stood here you wouldn’t be standing for long I assure you. I’d knock you clean out and throw you off a cliff.

--- End quote ---

Don't change the subject and certainly don't resort to making threats of violence.

That is totally uncalled for.

Edit: oh he deleted it. Classy.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod