EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
General => General Technical Chat => Topic started by: LektroiD on September 13, 2016, 03:18:12 pm
-
I'm looking for a cheap EPROM programmer, it will possibly only have one use, ever. So not looking for anything expensive or with all the added bells and whistles...
Basically all I want to do is flash the firmware on this chip, and I'm done...
Recommendations?
(https://s11.postimg.io/p3kha6ai9/IMG_0675.jpg)
-
https://pt.aliexpress.com/item/TOP853-USB-universal-programmer-EPROM-MCU-PIC-Writer-Duplicator-Burner/32711628189.html?spm=2114.02010208.3.2.ym501J&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_0,searchweb201602_3_10057_10056_10065_10037_10068_10055_10054_10069_301_10059_10033_10058_10032_10073_10017_10070_10060_10061_10052_10062_10053_10050_10051,searchweb201603_2&btsid=a884b906-8060-408a-86f0-5e9f9bf07f3d
-
Took me a while to get that in English... Seems it's £50 with postage, a bit more than what I had in mind to spend, the unit I'm flashing is only worth £50 anyway...
Is there any reason to spend that much, or will something like this work with that chip?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/191796916274 (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/191796916274)
-
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-411-minipro-tl866-universal-programmer-review/msg182431/#msg182431 (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-411-minipro-tl866-universal-programmer-review/msg182431/#msg182431)
And re-sell it when you are done.
-
If you have onl;y one eprom to write, is easy to find somebody that have one and can wrote to you, otherwise is quite cheap
-
Do you have an Arduino and some 74x chips handy? Google image search for "Arduino EEPROM programmer" turns up several prospective designs.
If you were willing to spend some money on a tool, the MiniPro TL866 is an absolute bargain. It can read, write, and/or test many devices including (EE)RPOMs, RAMs, NVRAMs, microcontrollers, PALs, logic chips. It is one of those "I'll never again go without one" kind of tools.
-
MiniPro TL866
PALs
I was wondering, can it do PALs / GALs reliably?
That always seems to be the failing point for the Chinese programmers