Author Topic: Low-noise frequency divider  (Read 994 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kpjamroTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: us
Low-noise frequency divider
« on: March 10, 2022, 03:13:52 pm »
What does it mean for a frequency divider (aka pre-scaler) to be "low noise?  The output is stated as being "rectangular".  The output wave form is attached.  This is dividing 100 MHz down to 10 MHz.  Is only phase noise relevant here?  I cannot measure phase noise directly.  Would a MDEV measurement be meaningful?


Ken

 
 

Offline Benta

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6420
  • Country: de
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2022, 07:36:22 pm »
One can only guess, but it sounds a bit like a marketing pitch.
1: low noise input for low amplitude analog inputs.
2: low irradiated noise from the power supply lines.
 

Offline eugene

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 497
  • Country: us
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2022, 08:10:17 pm »
What could possibly go wrong at 100 MHz?  :-DD
90% of quoted statistics are fictional
 

Offline MegaVolt

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 931
  • Country: by
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2022, 09:47:20 am »
Low Noise = Low Jitter
 

Offline jonpaul

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3656
  • Country: fr
  • Analog, magnetics, Power, HV, Audio, Cinema
    • IEEE Spectrum
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2022, 11:22:10 am »
Comparateur or Schmitt has jitter, creating phase noise

Jon
An Internet Dinosaur...
 

Online tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7334
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2022, 11:55:08 am »
Usually phase noise, which is typically a result of Johnson noise on the input buffer into the divider block, or the internal logic within, which will cause jitter on the output.

The result of phase noise is that the fundamental at 10MHz is 'smeared' over a larger range, it is no longer a sharp, singular point.  Of course, in reality, you can never have such a perfect input frequency to begin with, and barring some devices which 'clean' input frequencies, the phase noise is going to be determined by the worst component in the chain.

The consequence of this is that it reduces timing margins for downstream components, degrades ADC and DAC performance, and annoys audiophools who believe they can hear picoseconds of jitter.
 

Offline jonpaul

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3656
  • Country: fr
  • Analog, magnetics, Power, HV, Audio, Cinema
    • IEEE Spectrum
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2022, 01:25:30 pm »
Jitter is  critical in scopes trigger, time interval  measurement, GPS, nuclear research, at pico..femtosecond scale.

Digital Audio ADC DAC clock, see Dr Steve Harris 1986 AES / Crystal Semiconductor paper on effects of Jitter on digital audio.

We used wideband follower, buffers and MECL in 1970s.

See classic HP time interval counters 5370A, 5372A etc.

Jon
An Internet Dinosaur...
 

Offline kpjamroTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: us
Re: Low-noise frequency divider
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2022, 04:34:33 pm »
Thanks. 

It looks to me like the ragged top edge of the waveform is not random noise but rather a "feedthrough" of the input 100 MHz signal.  Since the output signal is perfectly synchronized with the input signal (it's a frequency divider) then this "noise" will not affect the phase of the 1->0 transition of the output and not contribute to phase noise.

In other words the raggedy top of the waveform itself does not contribute to phase noise and maybe does not matter.  It could be removed by passing the signal through a "squaring amplifier" or Schmidt trigger IC.  But you cannot tell by eyeball if that 1->0 transition is moving around in time.  I suspect it would cause a small variation in frequency (less than 1E-8) and so it might show up in an MDEV measurement. That's why I asked.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf