Author Topic: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?  (Read 9696 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bilkoTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 405
  • Country: 00
Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« on: April 24, 2011, 12:50:39 am »
Anybody care to comment on mating cycles for connectors. Most manufacturers specify how many mating cycles their connector can handle before there is a degradation in performance.
Is changing BNC sockets on test equipment a maintenance issue ?

See spec below for a typical BNC socket manufactured by Tyco

    TYCO ELECTRONICS / GREENPAR

Manufacturer Part No:
    1-1337494-0

RoHS Compliance : RoHS Compliant Yes

Description

    * SOCKET, BNC INS PCB R/A 50R SHEILDED
    * Coaxial Termination:Solder
    * Connector Mounting:PCB
    * Connector Type:BNC, Coaxial
    * Contact Material:Brass
    * Contact Plating:Gold
    * Frequency Max:4GHz
    * Impedance:50ohm
    * Body Plating:Nickel
    * Body Style:Right Angle Jack
    * Connector Mounting Orientation:PC Board
    * Connector Type:BNC, Coaxial
    * Contact Material:Brass
    * Contact Plating:Gold
    * Contact Resistance:1.5mohm
    * Insulation Resistance:5000Mohm
    * Insulator Material:
    * Mounting Type:PC Board
    * No. of Mating Cycles:50
    * Operating Temperature Max:+85°C
    * Operating Temperature Min:-55°C
    * Termination Method:Solder
    * Withstand Voltage:1500V
    * Working Voltage:500V
    * Mounting Orientation:Right Angle
    * Operating Frequency Max:4GHz
    * Plug Body Material:Zinc
 
« Last Edit: April 24, 2011, 12:52:41 am by yachtronics »
 

Offline qno

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 422
  • Country: nl
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2011, 08:59:11 am »
This is due to the gold plating.
Tinned connectors are much higher although not infinite.

Why spend money I don't have on things I don't need to impress people I don't like?
 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13747
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2011, 10:22:45 am »
Also note it's specced to 4GHz - the 50 cycles is what they guarantee the high-frequency performance for.
One would hope that in decent test gear they use connectors with a higher mating-cycle spec. They also tend to use different connectors for high frequency stuff over about 1GHz.
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline Fraser

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13168
  • Country: gb
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2011, 01:06:42 pm »
When working with calibrated HP and similar RF test gear for professional use it is very important that the calibration be maintained right up to the connectors (and beyond). The manufacturer is being very clear in their warning that after a certain number of connect/disconnect cycles, the RF connection is worn and should be considered a weak point in the calibration chain.

Interestingly, the more professional and expensive a piece of RF test equipment is, the less mating cycles you are likely to see stated. This reflects the manufacturers accute awareness of the vulnerability caused by mechanical connectors and risk of calibration errors due to connector losses.

In many professional RF labs you will see equipment fitted with sacraficial connectors that are scrapped after a certain number of mating cycles. The sacraficial connectors look like some sort of extension as they are male to female. Quality sacraficial connectors are expensive but cheaper than replacing the main RF connector on a piece of expensive RF test kit.

The SMA connector is commonly used as a constant impedance mechanical coupling and the small size of the pin and screw fitting makes them quite fragile and liable to relatively rapid wear if regularly uncoupled and recoupled.

In a less damanding lab or hobby environment users can normally consider the connector life to be very long and of no geat importance unless damage is visable. That is the big difference between professional RF test & calibration labs and the simple production or repair workshop environments.

A warning... if you buy a cheap Far Eastern produced SMA connector it will likely disappoint if you require very high performance. It is not unusual to spend GBP25 to GBP50 on a professional SMA connector for 18GHz. Far Eastern SMA connectors are fine for non demanding work below 5GHz but watch out for the gold plating peeling off of the SMA centre pin as that leaves swarf in you expensive test equipments RF socket ! Been there done that  :-[
« Last Edit: April 24, 2011, 03:12:20 pm by Aurora »
If I have helped you please consider a donation : https://gofund.me/c86b0a2c
 

Offline tekfan

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 385
  • Country: si
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2011, 01:43:06 pm »
Up to 1GHz there is no problem with BNC's even after 1000+ cycles. I stored a fast risetime square wave on an (25 year old) 1GHz scope when i got it and it still looks exaclty the same after more than 1000 cycles. Who knows how many times the BNC's were plugged and unplugged before. The scope still meets the rise time spec of 1GHz

For anything above 4GHz I would also use SMA's.
One can never have enough oscilloscopes.
 

alm

  • Guest
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2011, 02:20:22 pm »
SMA has better high-frequency performance than BNC, but I wouldn't consider it more durable.
 

Offline Zad

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1013
  • Country: gb
    • Digital Wizardry, Analogue Alchemy, Software Sorcery
Re: Mating Cycles - are your connectors worn out ?
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2011, 03:45:11 pm »
TNC connectors tend to be more robust than their bayonet counterpart, although obviously they are inherently slower to use. N connectors should be even more robust still.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf