Here again the wrong formula
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)
They add vehicle speed and wind speed for force part of the equation but not for the power part ?
How will that make any sense unless people just understand force but have no clue what power is.
That last therm also need to be v
o+v
w then result will be correct.
This can be tested relatively easy why is this not done at universities ? If they did this test they will realize their formula is just wrong and use the correct one.
Check this
https://www.omnicalculator.com/sports/cycling-wattage use 50kg cyclist weight 20kg bike weight 1km/h (0.277m/s) bike speed and 230km/h (63.88m/s) headwind.
The Cd*A for tops is 0.408
So 0.5 * 0.408 * 1.225 * (63.88 + 0.277)
2 * 0.277 = 284.9 less than they get 300W with no elevation but they add the other less significant parts as riling resistance
So yes you think 300W is enough to deal with 230km/h head wind ? If so you never experienced strong winds (I'm sure nobody here experienced 230km/h).
The most I have ever experienced is 110km/h gusts (not even continues wind speed) and this is 8x less damaging than 230km/h
Correct answer for that is 0.5 * 0.408 * 1.225 * (63.88 + 0.277)
2*(63.88 + 0.277) = 66kW
Unless you are a super hero with super human strength you will not going to pedal against a 230km/h wind at any speed not even 1km/h