I saw the original post (at ~1am here) and my first reaction was "No" - but I thought it best to sleep on it.
The subsequent responses have covered many points of concern I had - whitespace, continuous loading, drive by posts and so on. I am consistently bewildered by the claims of "improved usability" where it is just buzzwords dropped around something new which doesn't actually make things better. It's just "new". (BTW ... age, in itself, is NOT a reason to discard anything - IMHO).
There is, however, one aspect I have not seen mentioned - and that is one of discipline.
It does take a (tiny) bit of effort navigating here and that may require some measure of thought - to understand how to package what you want to say in a post. As has been said above, there is a lot of well thought out material here. What would be absolutely crippling to the value offered here is to make the platform so "engaging" that a flood of useless crap washes in, burying the gems.
So, I would suggest that if people really want to engage with those who have an extremely diverse range of skill and experience, then develop the discipline to learn how to do that in the framework that currently exists ... and works. If someone does not want to go to the "trouble" of working within an established environment, then I don't think I want to go to the trouble of pandering to their displeasure in having to learn.
I say this not as a put down to change, since adapting is one of the key characteristics of success - but that so much engineering is built from old, boring basics and putting yourself out to understand these through the simple application of oneself will serve you well.
In short, if you can't find the discipline to work within the current framework, then maybe you should avoid engineering pursuits.