For recent advances TI have pushed out a big range of chopper stabilised opamps, trimmed for offset and drift in various prices/powers/speeds
Why would a chopper stabilized operational amplifier require trimming?
To flip that around on you, why don't chopper amplifiers have zero offset and drift? take a look at the TI parts, they clearly have been trimmed at the factory to get the offsets in a tight distribution but now include 10+ MHz GBW parts that are very universal.
You will have to link an example datasheet or part number.
Also note that chopper amplifiers are *not* the same thing as chopper stabilized amplifiers.
The residual offset and drift of a chopper stabilized amplifier and as well as the best non-chopper stabilized precision amplifiers is limited by thermocouple effects which are outside the bounds of trimming. There is no expectation that they will not have close to a Gaussian distribution in various parameters and there is nothing unusual about a 10+ MHz chopper stabilized amplifier; that kind of speed would be unusual in a *chopper amplifier* which is not the same thing.
There is actually a good reason chopper stabilized amplifiers are often relatively slow; high speed CMOS amplifiers are usually noisy. Some TI parts are incredibly noisy but I assume this does not apply to their chopper stabilized amplifiers. Higher speed is also usually accompanied by higher heating which leads to larger errors from thermocouple effects. Precision is often associated with low power operation for this reason.
Chopper stabilized amplifier actually should be faster than precision bipolar precision parts because of built in transconductance reduction from using an FET input stage but this applies to any FET input stage.