You REALLY want to see nutso?
You are trying to bring too much "rationality" to human comprehension.
A few points for you to consider:
1) the fact that something is unlikely to be useful doesn't mean it is not useful: what's "useful" is highly subjective and dependent on the individual perception / definition of "use" and knowledge at that point in time and the context. A bottle of water is useless for a person drowning but a life saver for the same individual dying of thirst in the middle of a dessert.
2) the fact that something is not explainable today doesn't mean it is explainable: our knowledge will advance over time and a silly mystery today may be common knowledge tomorrow.
3) individual freedom vs. imposition of "intelligence" onto others: however rationale / optimal you may think your position is, you have no right to project it onto others. Everyone of us should be free to make our own decisions, however silly it may seem to you.
4) "religionize" science: science is ***one*** of many possible ways to understand our world. The key to science is the presumed assumption that science as we know it today is always wrong: something better and more comprehensive will come along tomorrow and revolutionize our understanding.
To follow that spirit of science, you have to keep an open mind - what's "un-scientific" today may be "scientific" tomorrow, and vice versa, however unlikely.
What you often see, unfortunately, are "scientists" who treat scientific discoveries with absolutism: what's science today will always be true and what's not science today will never be science.
By doing that, they have violated the fundamentals of science.