General > General Technical Chat

Dilbert loses newspapers, publishers, distributor, and possibly its website

<< < (137/222) > >>

Kim Christensen:

--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 06:02:57 pm ---Neither of which you have provided for any of your own assertions.
--- End quote ---

Quote one of those assertions that you want me to verify.


--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 06:02:57 pm ---
--- Quote from: Kim Christensen on March 12, 2023, 05:55:36 pm ---Even if I accept these findings as 100% accurate
--- End quote ---
I'm sure you wouldn't accept anything that is contrary to your current beliefs anyway. assertions.

--- End quote ---

Nice Ad Hominem attack with zero evidence.

Nominal Animal:

--- Quote from: Kim Christensen on March 12, 2023, 06:39:48 pm ---
--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 06:02:57 pm ---Neither of which you have provided for any of your own assertions.
--- End quote ---
Quote one of those assertions that you want me to verify.

--- End quote ---
Nope.  I'm not here to be your research assistant.

If you wanted to have even a shred of credibility, you would have shown at least one sub-field of science with similar significance or volume as psychology or pre-clinical cancer research with reproducibility above 90% (i.e., in less than 10% of articles, findings are found to be unreproducable) in a peer-reviewed article in a journal with the kind of reputation Nature has.  You haven't.  (There aren't any.  They don't call it a "reproducibility crisis" just because it sounds catchy.  There are smaller subfields like algorithms in ACM, which don't have reproducibility issues; but then again, they describe discovered methods and algorithms, and do not rely on data at all.)

Thus, the belief you asserted is completely unfounded.  Not only that, but you used word games to entice me to spend time and effort to prove mine, even though your counterargument was simply "I don't believe you", without a shred of support for it.

Using your own definitions, you're delegitimizing me for absolutely no reason except your own emotions, lowering yourself to the same level as Trump.  Using your own criteria, you should be therefore cancelled, and banned from here.  I disagree.

By my definitions, you're asking for proof without reciprocality, which means I must question the reasoning behind your questions, i.e. push back, just like I described I wished reporters did when encountering political blathering.  I definitely do not want you to be banned, and none of this will affect my attitude towards you in other threads.  (If there is something I can help you with, I will.)

Kim Christensen:

--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 06:55:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: Kim Christensen on March 12, 2023, 06:39:48 pm ---
--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 06:02:57 pm ---Neither of which you have provided for any of your own assertions.
--- End quote ---
Quote one of those assertions that you want me to verify.

--- End quote ---
Nope.  I'm not here to be your research assistant.

--- End quote ---

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. (That would be you)

Nominal Animal:

--- Quote from: Kim Christensen on March 12, 2023, 06:58:30 pm ---The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
--- End quote ---
Prove it, and I'll reconsider.

Tomorokoshi:

--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on March 12, 2023, 07:00:28 pm ---
--- Quote from: Kim Christensen on March 12, 2023, 06:58:30 pm ---The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
--- End quote ---
Prove it, and I'll reconsider.

--- End quote ---

Is this for real?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod