I remember this being a pretty high-profile misconduct case last year, and considered questionable at least since the retraction of the 2020 article.
Unfortunately, a lot of the original stories are paywalled as well but Wikipedia has a summary:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranga_P._Dias#Scientific_misconduct_investigationsI suppose it might not have attracted much attention in the general media. This is still a niche topic. More so since, unlike with LK-99, supposed room-temperature T
c would only have been achieved under enormous pressure (>100 GPa). Conveniently, that also narrows down the number of labs with the capabilities to replicate the experiment a lot.
Setting aside the issue of (alleged) fraud, I don't think people realize how messy superconductor research is. There is a significant theory gap. Even the question of why existing "high" T
c work isn't really settled. In the end, experimentalists just have to throw stuff at the wall and hope something sticks. And often it's just someone working on synthesizing new materials looking into superconductivity as a side project. They won't necessarily be set up for this, measurements can be rudimentary, results not really conclusive. There have been many claimed break throughs that didn't hold up under scrutiny.
But then sometimes they do, so dimissing them out of hand is not an option either. Most famously, when Bednorz and Müller published their discovery of ceramic superconductors in 1986, all they had was DC resistance measurements on samples consisting of three different compounds and they didn't even know which one was supposed to be superconducting. They won a Nobel Prize just one year later. You can read the story in their Nobel lecture:
https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/bednorz-muller-lecture-1.pdf