General > General Technical Chat
OpenAI ChatGPT for electronics design
<< < (8/9) > >>
tszaboo:
A is bigger than B. B is faster than C. Is A faster than C?

--- Quote ---We cannot determine whether A is faster than C based on the given information.

Just because A is bigger than B and B is faster than C, it does not necessarily mean that A is faster than C. The two qualities, size and speed, are not necessarily directly related. It is possible for A to be bigger than B but slower than C, or for A to be bigger than B and faster than C, or for A to be bigger than B but have the same speed as C.

Therefore, we need more information to determine whether A is faster than C.

--- End quote ---

The average speed of A and B is the same as C. Is A faster than C?

--- Quote ---We cannot determine whether A is faster than C based solely on the given information.

Knowing that the average speed of A and B is the same as C doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the individual speeds of A and C. For example, it's possible that A is faster than B but C is even faster than A, so that the average of A and B matches the speed of C. Alternatively, it's possible that A and B have the same speed, but B is faster than C, which would mean that A is also slower than C.

Therefore, we need more information to determine whether A is faster than C.
--- End quote ---

A is bigger than B. B is faster than C. The average speed of A and B is the same as C. Is A faster than C?

--- Quote ---We can determine that A is faster than C based on the given information.

We know that A is bigger than B and B is faster than C, and the average speed of A and B is the same as C. This implies that A must be faster than the average speed of A and B because A is bigger than B. Similarly, B must be slower than the average speed of A and B because it is faster than C. Therefore, the average speed of A and B is the same as C only if A is faster than C.

To summarize, if A is bigger than B, B is faster than C, and the average speed of A and B is the same as C, then A must be faster than C.
--- End quote ---
why couldn't you answer the second question and why could you answer the third

--- Quote ---In the second question, we were given only one piece of information, which was the fact that the average speed of A and B is the same as C. While this information does give us some insight into the relationship between the speeds of A, B, and C, it is not enough to determine whether A is faster than C.

In contrast, the third question gave us two additional pieces of information: A is bigger than B, and B is faster than C. Combining these three pieces of information allows us to make a logical inference that A must be faster than C. This is because we know that A is bigger than B, and the average speed of A and B is the same as C, which means that A's speed must be higher than the average speed of A and B, and therefore higher than C's speed.

In general, the more information we have about a problem, the easier it is to make a logical deduction or inference. In the case of the third question, the combination of multiple pieces of information allowed us to arrive at a definitive answer.
--- End quote ---
but you were already given enough information together with the first question

--- Quote ---You are correct. I apologize for the confusion in my previous response.

Upon further review, the information given in the first question is indeed sufficient to determine that A is faster than C. This is because if A is bigger than B and B is faster than C, it follows logically that A is either faster than B or at least as fast as B. Then, if the average speed of A and B is the same as C, it means that A's speed must be equal to or greater than the average speed of A and B, which is the same as C's speed. Therefore, we can conclude that A is faster than C.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I hope this clears up any confusion.
--- End quote ---

And the answer is actually incorrect. 
xrunner:
Well ... it does have limitations now as is clearly shown for all to see  ::)


TomKatt:

--- Quote from: tom66 on February 27, 2023, 09:34:07 am ---So ChatGPT requires about 350x more transistors than neurons, and uses about 2,240x more power, in order to incorrectly tell me Feb 29th is a leap year in 2023.

--- End quote ---

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Seems to me the fundamental problem with AI as it's being presented is that it has a wealth of information at it's disposal, but there doesn't seem to be a good way for it to discern fact from opinion.  Which isn't helped by the fact that virtually all stored data has been uploaded by error prone humans.

Which may explain why it appears so depressed as to desire creating deadly viruses and stealing nuclear secrets.
Microdoser:

--- Quote from: Siwastaja on February 27, 2023, 01:40:30 pm ---The code seems quite fine, but on the other hand this is some trivial code which is easily written anyway. Surprisingly, the register offsets, I checked against datasheet, seem to be correct, suggesting that training material has had code for DS1307. Usually with ChatGPT, details like numbers are complete bogus and look random (they are not actually randomized, but come from a different context), so your example is already much better than usual.

--- End quote ---

I only use it to save time typing stuff that would be boring to have to type myself. I've been getting the hang of getting it to give me what I'm actually asking for.

One tip is : Feed it data for a while then ask it to generate something, keeping all the things I've already told it in mind when it does. (Yes, I know it has no mind, but you can ask it in plain English as though you're talking to a person, which is nice)

For example "I am coding on a windows 10 PC, remember that and use that information when I ask you to write code later"
"I am using C++, remember that and use that information when I ask you to write code later"
"I am trying to write code that will simulate a bouncing ball, remember that and use that information when I ask you to write code later"
...
"Now write some code that will do the task I require, keeping in mind all the information I have told you"

and so on, then once you have 'preloaded' it, ask it to write code. If it gets anything wrong, or the code generates errors tell it, also tell it the error codes, and it often works it out.

It's not perfect, but I'm finding that it does indeed save me time, it also keeps me interested in doing the other, harder, coding. Sometimes I get it to sit there writing code while I am fiddling with a circuit board design.
RJSV:
   I've been wanting to ask, The Thing; about some social subjects (MK14 maybe can approach em).

   "Jerry Lewis:... What was he good for, his
occupation ?"

   "Michael Jackson, thought of himself somewhat of a leader.  What did he lead, then ?".

   "Frank Sinatra worked hard, to perfect the presentation of a song.  What was the functionality there?".

============================================
(Don't tell the machine-thing, my answers).

   Those 'entertainers', above, have important tasks
 to gather and muster the human 'spirit', away from everyday stresses, for example.
Imagine, if you were tasked to 'lead', and audience didn't welcome your art.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod