Author Topic: Oppenheimer Movie Review  (Read 27788 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Sal Ammoniac

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
  • Country: us
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #100 on: July 28, 2023, 06:00:06 pm »
Fritz Haber was a national hero in Germany between the world wars and Adolf Hitler personally offered to make an exception to the anti-Jewish laws for him but he turned down that offer and wanted to maintain his Jewish identity.

He did convert to Christianity, so perhaps his Jewish identity really wasn't that important to him.
Complexity is the number-one enemy of high-quality code.
 

Online Sal Ammoniac

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
  • Country: us
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #101 on: July 28, 2023, 06:12:32 pm »
The movie sort of treated the bomb like oh it really worked.

That was the plutonium implosion bomb. Implosion was required for the plutonium bomb because plutonium had too high a spontaneous fission rate to use the gun mechanism. A lot of theoretical work and engineering went into understanding implosion before a working bomb could be built.

The enriched uranium bomb, however, was considered to be such a sure thing that it wasn't even tested before it was used on Hiroshima.

If you look at the overall history of the Manhattan Project one thing stands out--the numerous unknowns forced the project leadership to hedge their bets by using multiple different techniques simultaneously. For example, plants to separate uranium using gaseous diffusion, thermal diffusion, and electromagnetic separation were all built on industrial scales. And an entirely separate infrastructure was built to produce plutonium and chemically separate it from the reaction byproducts.
Complexity is the number-one enemy of high-quality code.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16620
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #102 on: July 28, 2023, 06:48:20 pm »
That was the plutonium implosion bomb. Implosion was required for the plutonium bomb because plutonium had too high a spontaneous fission rate to use the gun mechanism. A lot of theoretical work and engineering went into understanding implosion before a working bomb could be built.

The way I remember it from two difference sources is that pure Pu239 could have worked in a gun type design, but their plutonium had too much contaminating Pu240 leading to a high spontaneous fission rate.  The Pu240 is created from Pu239 absorbing a neutron during the production process so to avoid it, a lower concentration of Pu239 has to be accepted for chemical separation lowering throughput.  You can make a lot of Pu239 per batch and accept a higher concentration of Pu240, or make less Pu239 per batch and get a more favorable ratio.

Nuclear weapons intended for naval deployment, where they will be in unavoidable close proximity to personal, use a process that cycles the Pu239 out more often so less Pu240 is produced making the cores are less radioactive.
 

Offline dietert1

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2073
  • Country: br
    • CADT Homepage
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #103 on: July 28, 2023, 06:51:57 pm »
Wikipedia describes Szilards early ideas as speculation. The science happened 1938 between Otto Hahn, Fritz Straßmann, Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch. Szilard reproduced the results of the german groups in 1939 and later joined the Manhatten project. In the end he opposed using the bomb for military purposes.
When travelling to visit Einstein in the USA Niels Bohr talked about the induced fission results to his former scholar Wheeler and to others. The concept of a controlled nuclear chain reaction is attributed to Enrico Fermi and 1942 they had the first reactor setup in Chicago.

Regards, Dieter
 

Offline Veteran68

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 727
  • Country: us
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #104 on: July 28, 2023, 08:45:00 pm »
Well murdering your prof with cyanide is a pretty big personal error up there with random bombings. I am GUESSING that didn't really happen?

According to "Modern Prometheus" Oppenheimer did indeed inject some type of poison into his professor's apple, or at least he claimed that he did.  The exact details vary, depending on who is relating the story.  The professor probably didn't eat the apple.  His father pulled strings so that Oppenheimer wasn't expelled or prosecuted, but one of the conditions was that he take psychiatric counseling.  He was definitely a troubled, brilliant, young man.

 

Offline HuronKing

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 230
  • Country: us
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #105 on: July 28, 2023, 08:51:22 pm »
Well murdering your prof with cyanide is a pretty big personal error up there with random bombings. I am GUESSING that didn't really happen?

According to "Modern Prometheus" Oppenheimer did indeed inject some type of poison into his professor's apple, or at least he claimed that he did.  The exact details vary, depending on who is relating the story.  The professor probably didn't eat the apple.  His father pulled strings so that Oppenheimer wasn't expelled or prosecuted, but one of the conditions was that he take psychiatric counseling.  He was definitely a troubled, brilliant, young man.



If *some* form of the incident never happened, I wonder why Oppenheimer's parents had to buy off the school to keep him from getting arrested.

It's unclear exactly what he did since according to witnesses Oppenheimer told different people different things... but it is evident he did a naughty whatever it was.
 

Offline KE5FX

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1894
  • Country: us
    • KE5FX.COM
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #106 on: July 28, 2023, 08:57:28 pm »
That's some impressive string-pulling.  "Uh, Dad, I tried to kill my professor with cyanide and now they're going to kick me out of school.  Bunch of reactionaries.  Can you, you know, say something to somebody?"
 

Online TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7954
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #107 on: July 28, 2023, 09:07:49 pm »
His parents were wealthy.  Enough said.

Szilard and Fermi patented the nuclear pile in the US:  filed 1944 and granted 1955.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2708656A/en

When I got to the University in 1970, the new library built on the site of Stagg Field had just opened.
The last bit of the stands (at 57th and Ellis) was supposed to be gone by then, but there had been a bookstore fire and they kept the run-down building temporarily until the bookstore could reopen.
 

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #108 on: July 28, 2023, 09:15:16 pm »
Quote
Implosion was required for the plutonium bomb because plutonium had too high a spontaneous fission rate to use the gun mechanism.

Curiously that isn't the case. David Hess is right.

You can make a "gun" device but you need a much higher velocity. The resulting device is about 5m long. The US built some mockups and spent a lot of time dropping them to get them to fall in a stable way instead of wobbling. I have a book by a guy who tracked down a lot of the drop sites of various mockup devices (he got the coordinates from a "contact"). Very good read.

Implosion is of course much more compact. As interesting is how they made 155mm shells... this is still well classified but most likely the PU was egg-shaped and charges convert it into a spherical shape. That destroys the shape of the shell of course but it doesn't matter by then.
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 

Offline msuffidy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 243
  • Country: ca
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #109 on: July 29, 2023, 03:42:17 am »
It seems to me that you are working with a bomb material that is pretty much always putting out some neutrons, so you would not like to like just handle it. When you squish it together somehow, all of a sudden so many neutrons are splitting more and more nucleus until there is a lot of energy being created. So it was classified at the time, but like maybe if you had like a vacuum foam bubbles in a sphere and you could just smash it all into a small sphere that would do it. Ideally the geometry would be very regular between the explosives and the metal foam ball, so you don't want like a tube canister between them. Or maybe there could be like a neutron inhibitor that scoots somehow as it is crushed.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2023, 04:46:20 am by msuffidy »
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16620
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #110 on: July 30, 2023, 02:27:48 am »
It seems to me that you are working with a bomb material that is pretty much always putting out some neutrons, so you would not like to like just handle it.

The original plutonium samples which were tested came from a giant mass spectrometer used to separate the plutonium, so were pure Pu239 with a very low spontaneous fission rate.  The plutonium that came from the reactor later however had considerable Pu240 and the measured spontaneous fission rate was way too high to support the gun type weapon as designed.  That is when they knew they had a problem and seriously considered the implosion design.

The lower the spontaneous fission rate is, the more time is available to assemble a critical mass.  Real designs include some way to apply a burst of neutrons to the compressed core at the optimum time, and starting out with a higher number of free neutrons produces greater yield.
 

Offline Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6912
  • Country: ca
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #111 on: July 30, 2023, 02:56:59 am »
So many nuclear experts here, what are you guys doing on Electronics forum  :popcorn:
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16620
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #112 on: July 30, 2023, 03:27:17 am »
So many nuclear experts here, what are you guys doing on Electronics forum  :popcorn:

Conversion weapon design is just a hobby.
 

Offline DonKu

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 40
  • Country: us
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #113 on: July 30, 2023, 05:46:01 am »
"The Day After Trinity" is the story of Oppenheimer and the development of the atomic bomb. The skeletons on sidewalks it shows are suitable for a "Terminator" movie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_After_Trinity

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22day+after+trinity%22&t=h_&iax=videos&ia=videos
 

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8652
  • Country: gb
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #114 on: July 30, 2023, 04:16:46 pm »
So many nuclear experts here, what are you guys doing on Electronics forum  :popcorn:
There are far more electronics engineers than physicists working on nuclear weapons.
 

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #115 on: July 30, 2023, 05:48:57 pm »
Seen the movie.

It's not bad although for non-informed viewers it suffers from difficulties in that there is basically no plot; it is just a long strings of events. It is a good attempt at historical accuracy.

The music is too loud in just a few short bits.
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 

Offline Infraviolet

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1017
  • Country: gb
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #116 on: July 30, 2023, 07:51:22 pm »
"There are far more electronics engineers than physicists working on nuclear weapons."
And then one remembers that some of the most notable books on Electronics were actually written by Physicists.
 

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8652
  • Country: gb
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #117 on: July 30, 2023, 08:35:33 pm »
"There are far more electronics engineers than physicists working on nuclear weapons."
And then one remembers that some of the most notable books on Electronics were actually written by Physicists.
Most of the really good RF engineers I have worked with had physics degrees, and were not eligible to join the relevant UK engineering institution (whose name has changed over time).
 

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #118 on: July 30, 2023, 09:30:12 pm »
I doubt anybody posting on this thread has any idea of the electronics in a modern atom bomb :)

And I am sure they have come a long way from a load of krytrons :)

Quote
were not eligible to join the relevant UK engineering institution

They must have felt absolutely terrible to be thus deprived of a real sense of belonging ;)
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8652
  • Country: gb
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #119 on: July 30, 2023, 09:39:04 pm »
Quote
were not eligible to join the relevant UK engineering institution
They must have felt absolutely terrible to be thus deprived of a real sense of belonging ;)
I know very few electronics engineers who went through the process of becoming a full member of the IEE (its old name). A lot of us joined as student members and that was it. I only found out about the physics people being excluded when I showed minor interest in becoming a full member, and couldn't muster four people who were full members to act as sponsors in a business with hundreds of electronics engineers.
 

Offline MadTux

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 785
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #120 on: July 30, 2023, 09:48:36 pm »
Fun fact, you could simply build a nuclear weapon with natural uranium back 3.5billion years ago.
Unfortunately the good stuff decays much faster, so much less is present now  ;D
 

Offline m98

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 615
  • Country: de
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #121 on: July 30, 2023, 10:06:04 pm »
I doubt anybody posting on this thread has any idea of the electronics in a modern atom bomb :)

And I am sure they have come a long way from a load of krytrons :)
I don't think they would have moved away from Krytrons, or rather Sprytrons. Why would they? Semiconductors are still catching up to their performance for pulsed power switching. Diode laser igniters might be the next technology step, but again, why would they want to innovate something that was probably perfected half a century ago?
 

Offline MadTux

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 785
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #122 on: July 30, 2023, 10:13:14 pm »
I doubt anybody posting on this thread has any idea of the electronics in a modern atom bomb :)

And I am sure they have come a long way from a load of krytrons :)
I don't think they would have moved away from Krytrons, or rather Sprytrons. Why would they? Semiconductors are still catching up to their performance for pulsed power switching. Diode laser igniters might be the next technology step, but again, why would they want to innovate something that was probably perfected half a century ago?
Exactly, wouldn't go boom any different, decrease in size probably only marginal, while huge risk with reliability of designs tested 100s of times in the 1950-1960s...
 

Offline peter-h

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3700
  • Country: gb
  • Doing electronics since the 1960s...
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #123 on: July 31, 2023, 08:17:57 am »
Regular tests are taking place these days too, but without the active material. So you can just do it in a bunker.

They must be using MOSFETs or similar nowadays. It is very easy. About 30 years ago I designed a handheld exploder device (these are widely used to trigger demolition/mining charges) and the spec is typically a few hunded volts and a few amps, discharged from a specific capacitor. There is a spec on the V/I profile to be achieved. The krytron or similar device does the job nicely (even at ~10000G for a 155mm shell - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W48) and at the time there was nothing else because valve technology won't deliver high currents. The krytron works by flashing over. There is totally no reason to use them today.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2023, 12:11:25 pm by peter-h »
Z80 Z180 Z280 Z8 S8 8031 8051 H8/300 H8/500 80x86 90S1200 32F417
 

Offline msuffidy

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 243
  • Country: ca
Re: Oppenheimer Movie Review
« Reply #124 on: July 31, 2023, 03:27:43 pm »
"The Day After Trinity" is the story of Oppenheimer and the development of the atomic bomb. The skeletons on sidewalks it shows are suitable for a "Terminator" movie.

Is this it?
https://archive.org/details/thedayaftertrinity
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf