Congratulations, on relatively solving the problem for now.
It's a workaround, not a solution. Assuming it's censorship (whether by Optus deliberately, or due to some deceptive complaint to Optus makes no difference, still censorship) then the problem is the existence of the system implementing such blocks.
I hope my joke about North Korea, did NOT offend you.
Ha. Takes a *lot* more than that to offend me. Even if meant literally, it's a fair comparison. The whole world is becoming Nth Korea.
But it's nothing new. Back when 'the web' was a brand new thing and in Australia virtually everyone was still using dial up modems to access BBS, I visited a friend at his office in a Telstra building in Sydney. He was a programmer. I'd never seen a web browser before, and for a while he left me alone in an office adjacent to his, to play with NCSA Mosaic. I think this was around 1993 or 4. Fun. But I also had a look at the papers on that desk, which belonged to a colleague of his who was away on holiday. They were the research work for a system Telstra was developing, to allow imposing total surveillance on the blooming public modem networks. This system would monitor all telephone lines, using signal analysis to identify, in order:
- What lines were being used by modems.
- For such lines, what modem protocol was in use (to the point of being able to capture the carried data.)
- Whether that data was using some encryption scheme.
- Attempting to identify _which_ encryption scheme was in use.
The purpose seemed to be specifically to identify who was using encryption, and what kind.
Just what you'd want if you were planning to criminalize use of encryption. Which there was talk of then, as now.
There was also some talk then of licensing/restricting/charging more for modem use.
I've always wished I had a chance to photocopy that stuff. Would have caused quite a drama. Also would have lost my friend his job. But then, he died a couple years later anyway.
To all those saying "carriers don't have legal permission to tap phones" yes they do. There are clauses that allow them to monitor ALL traffic, for purposes of 'system quality assurance'. And they do. Not just as part of Echellon and its descendants. But for all sorts of use. Not to mention the 'foreign allies' intercept rooms.
Any idea of privacy in electronic communications is an illusion; a public fable to keep fools happy.
Oh, and all that FBI wailing about how they can't decrypt an iPhone, and really want to? That's bullshit too. Big act, designed just to get more powers and pretend they currently can't do it. Go take a google at what John McAffee has to say about that.