OK. My judgmental POV.
I was among those "audiophiles" thrilled when we got rid of pops, skips, discwashers, plastic album liners, tone arm lifts and having to flip the record every 20 minutes (Thorens TT, Shure V 15 cartridge, etc). Used to evaluate recordings by the tape hiss. Bought only records with heavy vinyl from good press houses.
Not to mention storage and cataloging (once tried to find Brain Salad Surgery by looking in the "M"" section of the record store; you can figure out state of mind).
All gone. Now we mainly listen to WCRB which broadcasts live BSO events over the air. Yep, old school radio. BTW, the history of WCRB is pretty interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WCRBI can get that some may enjoy the "experience" of using vinyl. But, I suspect the "Monster Cable" effect is at play. Do those buying such things understand very few (none?) make recordings via analog; let alone the digital processing? Transcription to the master presses?
I do understand the benefits and joy of high end systems that are downstream from the source (tube or solid state) with excellent speakers. But even with a good TT/cartridge the drawbacks, which includes accessing "pristine" vinyl, to me digital media is the winner.
As a long time purveyor of vintage things, I have observed that fads pop up over "what my father had", whether watches, cameras, cars, clothes, furniture (Mid century modern???) whatever. I kept about 15 Nikon FMs which my daughter has and use. She tells me these are highly sought after and even the Sony Mavica I once had is worth quite a bit.
So BT turntables that fit this bill do not surprise me.