The known working model came from this 2006 paper.
The paper is interesting, assuming the observations are correct. Be very, very careful, particularly when human feedback is involved. Placebo effects can mislead even the best intended researchers. Never try to prove your own theories, always try to disprove them, because the easiest person to trick is oneself.
My first thoughts after reading the paper:
- the study was conducted on a very small sample, 4 persons, 2 of them being the authors + 2 their parents, which means the subjects were aware of the experiment, and aware about some expected outcome
- entanglement is synchronization between oscillations/oscillators (no matter if the oscillations are treated as waves or as particles). Synchronicity does not last forever. Once separated, the entangled oscillators will lose their synchronicity. Decoherence is a big problem (e.g. in quantum computing the typical fix for decoherence is, firstly, cryogenic temperatures - less temperature means less noise - and on top of that, applying all kind of error correction techniques, though there is no visible progress in quantum computing, so it is highly unlikely to overcome decoherence). Also decoherence happens almost instantly (in milliseconds or less, IIRC the max distance for entangled photons transported through a fiber optic, at room temperature, was in the range of a hundred km or so, so not exactly "to the other side of the universe" as it is told in popular science videos)
- in my opinion the conclusion from Bell's theorem are wrong. Entanglement, as in synchronized particles or waves, do exist, but there's no spooky action at a distance. The Bell's inequality appears because of all the random noises. Doesn't matter there was a Nobel prize for that, the bell shaped curve in the delayed choice experiment, and the Bell's inequality is not a proof of non-locality, it's only the result of noises in the experiment. However, I'm not a physicist, only looking into physics as a hobby, so I might have got it all wrong. Time will tell.
All these doesn't mean you should stop experimenting with what you are after.
Get yourself some wafers, and best luck with the next phase of the research.