EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
General => General Technical Chat => Topic started by: strawberry on August 26, 2023, 04:22:38 pm
-
this thing may not turn off in harsh winter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Khp3wb0QMpQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Khp3wb0QMpQ)
-
but it fails on which is the safe option, and with no electronics very rugged
-
Thermostatic, not thermionic (unless it has a vacuum tube in it)...
-
Modern ones don't use CdS photocells anyway, due to RoHS. They use photodiodes now.
-
it could be much better with two transistor hysteresis comparator
-
it could be much better with two transistor hysteresis comparator
Blows up the instant a lightning bolt strikes nearby. Warranty please!
Tim
-
it could be much better with two transistor hysteresis comparator
better in what way?
the thermostat fail safe on, rugged, provides a long low pass and hysteresis
-
it could be much better with two transistor hysteresis comparator
Blows up the instant a lightning bolt strikes nearby. Warranty please!
Tim
shielding and with some MOV
ST makes those 25A 1.2kV scr's
photo cell as power source and sensor at the same time
-
So it bursts into flame after ten years on the pole? ;D
Sarcasm aside, it's one of those odd design corners where you really gotta respect the simplicity and dumb brute force robustness of a mechanical solution. It solves multiple problems at once: a time constant, accurate enough response, strong switching (hysteresis) with low resistance (mechanical contact), long life, and few quirks and other downsides (couple watts idle power, undesired behavior when cold or restarting). And failsafe (better to have lights always-on than always-off). And it uses as many mechanical parts, or maybe fewer, than an electronic solution, and being stamped metal and rivets, a fraction of the cost (well, maybe, or potentially).
I wonder what the transient immunity of CdS actually is; you wouldn't expect them to be very linear, at least at some point, and yeah I'm pretty sure you'll get avalanche at some point; but for a visible-width track, it's got to be pretty high... They're surprisingly linear, at least at what voltages and time scales I've tested them at, and seen applications for.
I don't think there's a true non-mechanical pure-semiconductor solution that strictly (all parameters) outperforms such a device, with less than... maybe $100 of parts? Depends on how much TVS is required, and Rds(on) say using SiC MOSFETs as SSR.
Maybe not so bad if some assumptions can be made about the load characteristics (surge immunity is a heck of a lot easier into an inductive load), and strict outperformance surely isn't needed in a real product, but it's interesting to illustrate just how well a mechanical solution can do.
Tim
-
This is what's inside a modern one:
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/photoelectric-light-controls-with-thermionic-switches/?action=dlattach;attach=1860361)(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/chat/photoelectric-light-controls-with-thermionic-switches/?action=dlattach;attach=1860367)
You can see the chip in the photodiode is pretty big, it takes almost the full width of that T-5 package.
-
solid polymer capacitors could be better choice