Author Topic: Possible life on Venus?  (Read 5058 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BU508ATopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4542
  • Country: de
  • Per aspera ad astra
Possible life on Venus?
« on: September 14, 2020, 03:16:08 pm »
A few minutes ago appeared this article in National Geographic:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/09/possible-sign-of-life-found-on-venus-phosphine-gas/

Quote:
"“Something weird is happening” in the clouds of the planet next door—but some experts are raising doubts about the quality of the data."
“Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. It always defeats order, because it is better organized.”            - Terry Pratchett -
 

Offline donotdespisethesnake

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: gb
  • Embedded stuff
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2020, 05:55:23 pm »
That news leaked out a while ago. It seems to be 99% "we don't know" and 1% "it could be life of some sort".

Bob
"All you said is just a bunch of opinions."
 

Offline Refrigerator

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1593
  • Country: lt
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2020, 08:15:49 pm »
That news leaked out a while ago. It seems to be 99% "we don't know" and 1% "it could be life of some sort".



Considering how unlikely life is to exist we are to find life elsewhere, 1% is quite high  :D
« Last Edit: September 17, 2020, 07:20:38 am by Refrigerator »
I have a blog at http://brimmingideas.blogspot.com/ . Now less empty than ever before !
An expert of making MOSFETs explode.
 

Offline Alex Eisenhut

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3549
  • Country: ca
  • Place text here.
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2020, 09:09:04 pm »
Life is very likely to exist elsewhere. The amount of "elsewhere" we've looked at close enough is practically zero.
Hoarder of 8-bit Commodore relics and 1960s Tektronix 500-series stuff. Unconventional interior decorator.
 
The following users thanked this post: daqq, wraper, SilverSolder, james_s

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2020, 10:03:35 pm »
There's not always that much sign of intelligent life DOWN HERE!  :-DD

Fanciful fantasties, but utter nonsense.
 
The following users thanked this post: GerritMax

Offline Cerebus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10576
  • Country: gb
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2020, 12:56:49 am »
Anybody got a syringe I can use to squeeze the magic smoke back into this?
 
The following users thanked this post: daqq, tooki

Offline VK3DRB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2272
  • Country: au
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2020, 03:40:13 am »
Forget Venus, try the USA :scared:.

Further "evidence" of aliens in our solar system is the US Customs Immigration which has a queue next to "US Citizens" named "Aliens".

Alien: TAKE ME TO YOU LEADER.
Officer: Er, why don't have one sir, not here anyway. But even if we did, you and your ship have to go into quarantine for 14 days. :-DD

 
The following users thanked this post: GerritMax

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2020, 03:57:25 am »
It's a God-awful small affair.

iratus parum formica
 

Offline donotdespisethesnake

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: gb
  • Embedded stuff
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2020, 07:30:28 pm »
The sticking points I have with the venus-life hypothesis is in order to survive the 80% sulphuric acid clouds, either:

1) the life forms have a completely different basis to Earth (e.g a non-carbon base). That would be an even more shocking discovery.

2) they have an incredibly tough sealed acid-resistant exterior, like kevlar but stronger. In which case, how do they get nutrients in etc.

These cannot simply be tough anaerobic bacteria like those we find on Earth. Even the extremophiles live in <5% acid conditions. If early Venus was watery and Earth like, it would be a remarkable feat of evolution.

So my bet is on unusual chemistry. We'll need to be more cautious with our choice of bio-signatures. In the future we will probably discover hundreds or thousands of exoplanets with some "hints of life" type signatures, and never know for sure. Sending interstellar probes is not practical for the foreseeable future.

Although paradoxically, if the "Great Filter" theory is true, we should hope we don't find many examples of extraterrestrial life. Otherwise we have to answer the question, "if life is so common, why does it get snuffed out before reaching an advanced stage?"
Bob
"All you said is just a bunch of opinions."
 

Offline Cerebus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10576
  • Country: gb
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2020, 08:42:55 pm »
The sticking points I have with the venus-life hypothesis is in order to survive the 80% sulphuric acid clouds, either:

1) the life forms have a completely different basis to Earth (e.g a non-carbon base). That would be an even more shocking discovery.

2) they have an incredibly tough sealed acid-resistant exterior, like kevlar but stronger. In which case, how do they get nutrients in etc.

3) They don't even attempt to survive in the clouds of acid gas, but in some other environmental niche.

If we were observing Earth from Venus we'd be completely unaware of environmental niches that can only be observed from relatively close. From odd micro-environments like black smokers to the whole range of macro-environments that range from tropical rain forest, tundra, permafrost, cold deserts, hot deserts, cave environments and so on. Drawing a broad conclusion from the first environment that can be observed through a telescope with a spectrometer would be short-sighted.

Also, one has to make allowance for billions of years of evolutionary pressures operating to produce viable organisms. We have bacteria that have evolved on Earth to thrive in the cyanide loaded tailings of gold mining, and in the pH 0 tailings of iron mining, all in the very short period of time, in evolutionary terms, that those processes have been in use - both environments which one would naïvely say were inimical to life as we know it. Also, what's to say that this is ancient life, if indeed it is life, that we're now observing? What's not to say that this is the relatively recent beginnings of life in that environment?
Anybody got a syringe I can use to squeeze the magic smoke back into this?
 

Offline raptor1956

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2020, 02:14:25 am »
Given the temp on Venus even the most extreme extreme-o-philes would not last long -- seconds at most.  I'm going to go with simply an interesting chemical reaction.

The Fermi paradox still holds.


Brian
 

Offline CatalinaWOW

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5569
  • Country: us
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2020, 02:31:40 am »
The life hypothesis assumes they exist at high altitudes where temperatures are well within known life ranges.  It would be very exciting if true because it would lend credence to the Asimov proposal to seed the upper Venusian atmosphere with photosynthesizing microbes.  Which would eventually consume the CO2 reducing or ending the greenhouse effect.  Not a short term plan.  Many centuries to start the cooling and many more before planetary surface temperatures would drop to reasonable values, but think of all the real estate.
 

Offline cdev

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 7350
  • Country: 00
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2020, 02:54:20 am »

These photos were taken on venus by one of the several Venera space probes.

« Last Edit: September 17, 2020, 08:22:37 pm by cdev »
"What the large print giveth, the small print taketh away."
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10172
  • Country: gb
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2020, 10:42:29 am »
The life hypothesis assumes they exist at high altitudes where temperatures are well within known life ranges.  It would be very exciting if true because it would lend credence to the Asimov proposal to seed the upper Venusian atmosphere with photosynthesizing microbes.  Which would eventually consume the CO2 reducing or ending the greenhouse effect.  Not a short term plan.  Many centuries to start the cooling and many more before planetary surface temperatures would drop to reasonable values, but think of all the real estate.

^ An important point, the thread would more properly be called 'Possible life above Venus'. The pressures at the surface make it entirely possible for the atmosphere to have its own goldilocks zone at high altitude. Again, with the pressure gradient, it wouldn't be hard for microbes to have sufficient buoyancy to stay there.

It would be very easy to put a buoyant probe into that zone, more or less indefinitely - far easier than putting another very short lived probe on the surface. Once you've put one on the surface, for the achievement / hell of it / to look for big ceramic monsters roaming the surface, there's really no reason to expend the resources to ever go down there again.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-54133538
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline donotdespisethesnake

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: gb
  • Embedded stuff
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2020, 11:14:36 am »
The sticking points I have with the venus-life hypothesis is in order to survive the 80% sulphuric acid clouds, either:

1) the life forms have a completely different basis to Earth (e.g a non-carbon base). That would be an even more shocking discovery.

2) they have an incredibly tough sealed acid-resistant exterior, like kevlar but stronger. In which case, how do they get nutrients in etc.

3) They don't even attempt to survive in the clouds of acid gas, but in some other environmental niche.

If we were observing Earth from Venus we'd be completely unaware of environmental niches that can only be observed from relatively close. From odd micro-environments like black smokers to the whole range of macro-environments that range from tropical rain forest, tundra, permafrost, cold deserts, hot deserts, cave environments and so on. Drawing a broad conclusion from the first environment that can be observed through a telescope with a spectrometer would be short-sighted.

Well, the niche the researchers propose is in the clouds 40 km up. There are Hadley cells that circulate a permanent cloud layer, where the clouds are mostly droplets of sulphuric acid. It is possible that the phospine is produced somewhere else and migrates to the cloud layer.


Quote
Also, one has to make allowance for billions of years of evolutionary pressures operating to produce viable organisms. We have bacteria that have evolved on Earth to thrive in the cyanide loaded tailings of gold mining, and in the pH 0 tailings of iron mining, all in the very short period of time, in evolutionary terms, that those processes have been in use - both environments which one would naïvely say were inimical to life as we know it. Also, what's to say that this is ancient life, if indeed it is life, that we're now observing? What's not to say that this is the relatively recent beginnings of life in that environment?

Sure that is true. We are basing all our expections of extraterrestrial life, and detection methods thereof, on extrapolations of Earthly life. It could be that life is common, but carbon based life using water as a solvent is just one of many types. Maybe evolution on Earth has not had to try very hard, because most of Earth is quite benign. That may be because life adapts the planet to it's preference - the Gaia principle. However, if Gaia thoery is true, as a corollary of that, we might think that if life on Venus had started when it was benign, them it should have maintained those benign conditions instead of runaway greenhouse effect.

There are so many questions about life and evolution we don't the answer to, it is far too premature to assume life is a cause of unexpected chemistry. Planetary geochemistry is also largely unknown, it is really too simplistic to say "if we find substance X, that means there is a good probability of life". I like the adage "the answer is never life, until it is proven to be life".

There is also an intriguing possibility there borderline life-like processes. Something between prions and viruses. Molecules that can use a catalyst to self-replicate. Logic by itself will not answer these questions. Only studying the environments in more detail will help.

Bob
"All you said is just a bunch of opinions."
 

Offline Cerebus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10576
  • Country: gb
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2020, 01:10:04 pm »

Sure that is true. We are basing all our expections of extraterrestrial life, and detection methods thereof, on extrapolations of Earthly life. It could be that life is common, but carbon based life using water as a solvent is just one of many types. Maybe evolution on Earth has not had to try very hard, because most of Earth is quite benign.


I think you're having a problem here because you're making quite reasonable hypotheses on one hand, and holding a bunch of interfering assumptions on the other. The assumption that Earth is benign is a wrong assumption to make. From the perspective of a different biochemistry 300ºK and a 20% oxygen atmosphere might be anything but benign - way too hot, way too cold. Heck, from the perspective of Earth biochemistry that highly reactive 20% oxygen atmosphere is anything but benign, why do you think every life form on Earth is riddled with antioxidants? Life here has evolved to make use of that oxygen atmosphere but if you were choosing a system to work under, you wouldn't choose one where one spark makes the difference  between a tree living and going up in flames and every organism has to protect itself against the atmosphere it lives in. However, evolution managed to cope with such a nastily reactive, poisonous atmosphere and even turned it to advantage - having such a large pool of redox potential available (atmospheric oxygen) is why terrestrial creatures can move so fast.

Quote
There are so many questions about life and evolution we don't the answer to, it is far too premature to assume life is a cause of unexpected chemistry.

The reactions that cause people to suggest life as a possible explanation are ones where the reactions are going uphill energetically when, from a simple chemistry perspective, you'd expect them to be going downhill. The blindly obvious one on Earth is the formation of free atmospheric oxygen when all the chemical expectations are that under Earth-like conditions oxygen binds to something and then stays there. The only place you see these reactions happen 'uphill' on Earth is where life is involved and it's a reasonable tack to be taking to search for life as we understand it to be, even if it was life that could be in many ways different from terrestrial life. In fact, in this context, it's probably the most useful working definition of what constitutes "life".

There is also an intriguing possibility there borderline life-like processes. Something between prions and viruses. Molecules that can use a catalyst to self-replicate. Logic by itself will not answer these questions. Only studying the environments in more detail will help.

You do know what an enzyme is, don't you? That's pretty much the basis of life on Earth, enzymes are molecules that can catalyse very specific (usually energetically unfavourable) chemical reactions to create or modify the building blocks of life.
Anybody got a syringe I can use to squeeze the magic smoke back into this?
 

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9821
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2020, 01:56:41 pm »
3) They don't even attempt to survive in the clouds of acid gas, but in some other environmental niche.

If we were observing Earth from Venus we'd be completely unaware of environmental niches that can only be observed from relatively close. From odd micro-environments like black smokers to the whole range of macro-environments that range from tropical rain forest, tundra, permafrost, cold deserts, hot deserts, cave environments and so on. Drawing a broad conclusion from the first environment that can be observed through a telescope with a spectrometer would be short-sighted.

Also, one has to make allowance for billions of years of evolutionary pressures operating to produce viable organisms. We have bacteria that have evolved on Earth to thrive in the cyanide loaded tailings of gold mining, and in the pH 0 tailings of iron mining, all in the very short period of time, in evolutionary terms, that those processes have been in use - both environments which one would naïvely say were inimical to life as we know it. Also, what's to say that this is ancient life, if indeed it is life, that we're now observing? What's not to say that this is the relatively recent beginnings of life in that environment?
Exactly. We've been caught out by extremophiles on Earth, upturning our views and beliefs. There's no saying what conditions Venus could serve up and how life may have adapted, whether that's carbon based or anything else.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9821
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2020, 01:59:33 pm »
Given the temp on Venus even the most extreme extreme-o-philes would not last long -- seconds at most.  I'm going to go with simply an interesting chemical reaction.

The Fermi paradox still holds.


Brian
We felt the same about extremophiles we didn't know about before. Yet they popped up and somehow filled their niche.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Offline donotdespisethesnake

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: gb
  • Embedded stuff
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2020, 02:44:56 pm »
You do know what an enzyme is, don't you?

No, I have no fucking clue, because I am a fucking moron. Of course I know what a fucking enzyme is!

But thanks for your patronizing comments, it really helps the discussion.
Bob
"All you said is just a bunch of opinions."
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8995
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2020, 03:29:38 pm »
Unfortunately, I never saw the episodes (69 and 70) of the TV show "The Six Million Dollar Man" that had an interesting synopsis:
A Russian planetary probe, designed for a soft landing on Venus with extraordinary survival capability due to a super-alloy, gets loose in Wyoming and the superhero is required to stop its rampage.
 

Offline Cerebus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10576
  • Country: gb
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2020, 03:49:29 pm »
You do know what an enzyme is, don't you?

No, I have no fucking clue, because I am a fucking moron. Of course I know what a fucking enzyme is!

But thanks for your patronizing comments, it really helps the discussion.
 :=\ :=\ :=\ :=\ :=\ :=\ :=\ :=\

How should I know that you know what an enzyme is without posing the question when you practically describe one as if it's a novel bit of biochemistry? It's a straight question. No patronizing was intended.

Trust me, if I'm being deliberately rude or patronising, you'll know it. But don't expect me to walk on eggshells just because you've got a fragile ego and immediately take offence at an innocent question. It's been my experience that a lot of engineering types can be remarkably ignorant outside the the maths/physics/electronics arena - go and check out any of this year's earlier discussions on Covid-19 to find proof of that. Ignorance is not the same thing as stupidity. Assuming that you know what enzymes are when you practically describe them as if they're something new would be foolish. Would you prefer that I had assumed you knew what they were and started berating you for making what would be an apparently stupid assertion on that basis? Seems you'd want to pick a fight either way.
Anybody got a syringe I can use to squeeze the magic smoke back into this?
 
The following users thanked this post: Ed.Kloonk, tooki

Offline eti

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1801
  • Country: gb
  • MOD: a.k.a Unlokia, glossywhite, iamwhoiam etc
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #21 on: September 17, 2020, 05:10:51 am »
You do know what an enzyme is, don't you?

No, I have no fucking clue, because I am a fucking moron. Of course I know what a fucking enzyme is!

But thanks for your patronizing comments, it really helps the discussion.

If you speak like that to people, how do you expect them to react - positively? Maybe you should deal with your personality issues before engaging in discussion. Imagine how well that would have ended if you'd been face to face with them.

Chill out, go eat a banana and thump a few trees. 
 

Offline chickenHeadKnob

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1062
  • Country: ca
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #22 on: September 17, 2020, 05:32:45 am »

It would be very easy to put a buoyant probe into that zone, more or less indefinitely - far easier than putting another very short lived probe on the surface. Once you've put one on the surface, for the achievement / hell of it / to look for big ceramic monsters roaming the surface, there's really no reason to expend the resources to ever go down there again.

The moment the news broke on this story I began wracking my brainz trying to figure out how you would capture any of these cloud lifeforms intact and return to earth for study.
It seems a non-trivial problem. Initial collection maybe easy, but then what. They may be sturdy extremophiles in their native conditions, but then turn into a bowl of small molecule soup by the time you get them back to earth.
 

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2020, 05:36:32 am »

It would be very easy to put a buoyant probe into that zone, more or less indefinitely - far easier than putting another very short lived probe on the surface. Once you've put one on the surface, for the achievement / hell of it / to look for big ceramic monsters roaming the surface, there's really no reason to expend the resources to ever go down there again.

The moment the news broke on this story I began wracking my brainz trying to figure out how you would capture any of these cloud lifeforms intact and return to earth for study.
It seems a non-trivial problem. Initial collection maybe easy, but then what. They may be sturdy extremophiles in their native conditions, but then turn into a bowl of small molecule soup by the time you get them back to earth.

No one would have believed that in the first few years of the 21st century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own.

« Last Edit: September 17, 2020, 05:40:40 am by Ed.Kloonk »
iratus parum formica
 
The following users thanked this post: Cerebus

Offline RoGeorge

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7011
  • Country: ro
Re: Possible life on Venus?
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2020, 06:04:40 am »
Chill down everybody, men are from Mars, women are from Venus.   ;D
 
The following users thanked this post: BU508A, duckduck


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf