| General > General Technical Chat |
| Questions for those who know electromagnetism better than I do |
| << < (4/11) > >> |
| Slartibartfast:
--- Quote from: rstofer on August 24, 2021, 05:23:25 am ---I will take the opportunity to avoid Maxwell's Equations at every opportunity. --- End quote --- That won't be difficult, as pretty much all cases where they are analytically solvable are covered in literature, and all other cases need numerical methods (simulation) to solve. --- Quote --- but the math can get really ugly. --- End quote --- I guess you just haven't seen ugly math. ;) Dealing with Maxwell's equations is a treat compared to some stuff in General Relativity, or even worse, Quantum Field Theory. But, yes, high school math is not sufficient to solve Maxwell's equations. |
| bsdphk:
--- Quote from: rstofer on August 20, 2021, 03:27:51 am ---Three people in history have understood Maxwell's Equations: Maxwell, Feynman and Einstein. --- End quote --- Just because you do not grok them, does not mean that only card-carrying geniuses can. There are lots of non-nobel-laurates who have done amazing things with Maxwells Equations, for one thing Bell Labs where knee-deep in the stuff for 60 years. Here is a random example: https://archive.org/details/bstj40-1-233/mode/2up |
| rstofer:
--- Quote from: Slartibartfast on August 24, 2021, 09:00:13 am --- --- Quote from: rstofer on August 24, 2021, 05:23:25 am ---I will take the opportunity to avoid Maxwell's Equations at every opportunity. --- End quote --- That won't be difficult, as pretty much all cases where they are analytically solvable are covered in literature, and all other cases need numerical methods (simulation) to solve. --- Quote --- but the math can get really ugly. --- End quote --- I guess you just haven't seen ugly math. ;) Dealing with Maxwell's equations is a treat compared to some stuff in General Relativity, or even worse, Quantum Field Theory. But, yes, high school math is not sufficient to solve Maxwell's equations. --- End quote --- I took that Field Theory class in '73. No computers, no plotters, no calculators, if numbers were used so were slide rules. Everything was a handwave and all that was presented were endless equations. I still have the book but it hasn't gotten a lot of reading time over the decades. I noticed the Bell Labs paper had not a single graph, chart or plot. Just endless equations. Not my cup of tea but it was written in 1961. Tools just weren't as sophisticated. Breaking up the Bell system was a huge mistake. Bell Labs was a national treasure. Now owned by Nokia... Eleven Nobel Prize winners worked for Bell Labs. There's a reason I concentrated on digital in grad school. |
| mawyatt:
--- Quote from: rstofer on August 24, 2021, 05:46:33 pm ---Breaking up the Bell system was a huge mistake. Bell Labs was a national treasure. Now owned by Nokia... Eleven Nobel Prize winners worked for Bell Labs. --- End quote --- I've always considered breaking up of Bell Labs as one of the greatest blunders of all time. Recall a comment by the USG about this, saying "don't worry our nationals labs will continue with all the research!!", yeah right :P Best, |
| mawyatt:
Isn't Oliver Heavyside credited with consolidating Maxwell's works into what today we refer to as "Maxwell's Equations"? I took Fields and Waves long ago and recall we used this conductive paper which we painted conductors on. This was basically a type of analog simulation where you could measure and plot the equipotential field lines using a VOM and power supply. This was the same time when we were designing hybrids using Rubylith and an Exacto knife ::) Best, |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |