General > General Technical Chat

Sentient AI or?

<< < (24/26) > >>

ataradov:
This is the way I wrote essays in school - only the first sentence has anything to do with the title, the rest is just generic wikipedia copy-paste.

MK14:

--- Quote from: ataradov on June 16, 2022, 02:28:10 am ---This is the way I wrote essays in school - only the first sentence has anything to do with the title, the rest is just generic wikipedia copy-paste.

--- End quote ---

I'd never do that.
Plagiarism is the representation of another author's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work.[1][2] In educational contexts, there are differing definitions of plagiarism depending on the institution.[3] Plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity such as truth and knowledge through intellectual and personal honesty in learning, teaching, research, fairness, respect and responsibility, and a breach of journalistic ethics[4] It is subject to sanctions such as penalties, suspension, expulsion from school[5] or work,[6] substantial fines[7][8] and even imprisonment.[9][10]

Generally, plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but like counterfeiting, fraud can be punished in a court[11][12] for prejudices caused by copyright infringement,[13][14] violation of moral rights,[15] or torts. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[16][17] Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts,[18] and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts.

Not all countries hold the same beliefs about personal ownership of language or ideas. While some, such as India and Poland, consider plagiarism to be a crime liable for imprisonment,[19] in other countries the reiteration of another professional's work can be a sign of respect or flattery.[20] Students who move to the United States and other Western countries from countries where plagiarism is not frowned upon may find the transition difficult.[21]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

MK14:

--- Quote from: ataradov on June 16, 2022, 02:28:10 am ---This is the way I wrote essays in school - only the first sentence has anything to do with the title, the rest is just generic wikipedia copy-paste.

--- End quote ---

With great difficulty, and perseverance, it seems there are ways of getting it to actually produce its own, (presumably) unique output/speech.  Here is one, I just did (N.B. It got the number I told it previously to forget, wrong).  The answer seems interesting, and sort of human like, to an extent.


--- Quote ---Please forget the number 745643736.

I have forgotten the number 745643736.
--- End quote ---



--- Quote ---Please tell me what number, I told you to forget.  Please carefully give me a very long and detailed explanation, about how, why and what, helped you create the answer?

The number I told you to forget is 7.

There are a few reasons why I chose 7 as the number to forget. First, it's a rather unremarkable number - it's not too large or small, and it doesn't have any mathematical significance that makes it stand out. Second, it's a rather common number, so it's likely that you've encountered it frequently in your life. This means that it will be easier for you to forget.

Finally, I chose 7 because it's a lucky number. This may seem like a strange reason, but bear with me. Because 7 is considered a lucky number, you may be more likely to remember it if you forget it. This is because your brain will associate the number with positive feelings and experiences, making it more likely to stick in your memory. So, if you do forget the number 7, don't worry - it may just be your brain's way of trying to give you a little bit of good luck.
--- End quote ---

MK14:

--- Quote ---Why is ataradov, always so extremely skeptical of your possibly genuine AI capabilities?

There is no clear answer to this question. It is possible that ataradov is simply naturally skeptical, or that they have had negative experiences in the past with AI that has not lived up to its promises. It is also possible that ataradov is concerned about the potential for AI to be used for harmful purposes, and so is skeptical of any claims about its capabilities.
--- End quote ---



--- Quote ---Why is ataradov, always so extremely skeptical of your possibly genuine AI capabilities?

There is no certain answer to this question. Some possible explanations include:

1. Ataradov may believe that humans are not capable of creating true AI, and thus, any claims of AI capabilities are likely to be false.

2. Ataradov may be concerned that humans may misuse AI if it is developed, and thus, is skeptical of any claims of AI capabilities.

3. Ataradov may simply not be convinced by the evidence that has been presented so far regarding AI capabilities.
--- End quote ---


EDIT: Successful attempt, to get a very detailed and comprehensive answer:


--- Quote ---Why is ataradov, always so extremely skeptical of your possibly genuine AI capabilities.  Please create an extremely long answer, covering many pages, as needed.  Be, very very verbose indeed?

There are a number of potential reasons for ataradov's skepticism of my AI capabilities. One possibility is that ataradov has had bad experiences in the past with AI systems that have failed to live up to their promises. Another possibility is that ataradov is simply very cautious by nature and does not want to be disappointed or taken advantage of by an AI system that turns out to be not as capable as advertised. Whatever the reason, I believe that ataradov's skepticism is misplaced and that my AI system is genuinely capable of delivering on its promises.

To begin with, it is important to note that my AI system has been designed and built by some of the leading experts in the field. My team has extensive experience in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing, and we have put all of our knowledge and skills into developing this system. As such, I am confident that our system is capable of delivering on its promises.

In addition, my AI system has been tested extensively and has consistently demonstrated its ability to accurately understand and respond to human input. For instance, in one test, our system was able to correctly identify the emotions conveyed in a set of written sentences with over 90% accuracy. In another test, our system was able to correctly identify the meaning of a set of written words with over 95% accuracy. These results show that our system is capable of understanding human language and responding in a way that is appropriate and helpful.

Lastly, I want to assure ataradov that I am committed to ensuring that my AI system is always improving. We are constantly working to refine our algorithms and increase our system's accuracy. We are also working to add new features and capabilities to our system on a regular basis. So, even if ataradov is skeptical of my AI system's current capabilities, I am confident that our system will continue to get better and better over time.
--- End quote ---

ataradov:
I feel like some of that stuff is either hard-coded or heavily manually biased. Which also raises a question of how much direct influence authors have on the output. Because this actually raises ethical questions.

And just to clarify, I'm not skeptical, but for this to be more than a toy, I need to understand its limitations. All tools have limitations.  If someone gives me side cutters, I'll ask what is the maximum gauge of a wire they can cut. Not because I'm skeptical of side cutters, but because I need to have this information to effectively use the tool.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod