| General > General Technical Chat |
| Sentient AI or? |
| << < (19/26) > >> |
| ataradov:
To be fair, this is not a bad read. This won't win Pulitzer prize or anything, but it is passable as something that would be written by a human. I've seen much worse written by humans. Now, it can hold itself together for a couple sentences pretty well. With minor editing this can be self published on Amazon. The next step would be to have an entire novel, or at least a short story with a coherent plot line. |
| MK14:
I changed the story, and it now writes it out correctly, and seems to understand about time-travel and its consequences. Which is surprising for a non-human AI system. --- Quote ---Write a short story about a man who goes back in time and kills his grandmother, and then ceases to have ever existed. The man was a time traveler, and he had gone back in time to kill his grandmother. He knew that if he killed her, he would never have been born, and so he would cease to exist. He was okay with that. He didn't want to exist anymore. He wanted to end his pain. So he killed his grandmother, and then he ceased to exist. --- End quote --- |
| ataradov:
It might not "understand". This is not an uncommon motif, and based on what we have seen, it has ability to preserve a lot of context from the source material. Especially the part about the pain, which is not preset in the prompt. |
| MK14:
--- Quote from: ataradov on June 15, 2022, 10:53:53 pm ---It might not "understand". This is not an uncommon motif, and based on what we have seen, it has ability to preserve a lot of context from the source material. Especially the part about the pain, which is not preset in the prompt. --- End quote --- I thought I'd let it answer the question for you. --- Quote ---It might not "understand". This is not an uncommon motif, and based on what we have seen, it has ability to preserve a lot of context from the source material. Especially the part about the pain, which is not preset in the prompt. Given the context, it could be that the bot is a sketchy dealer. It's also possible that this is just a very simple bot that only responds to very simple inputs. --- End quote --- Another/later run: --- Quote ---It might not "understand". This is not an uncommon motif, and based on what we have seen, it has ability to preserve a lot of context from the source material. Especially the part about the pain, which is not preset in the prompt. There is no requirement that a vignette is "understandable". <p>The prompt: Stone, sky, bird. A short breeze. Pain.</p> --- End quote --- The tone and mood of this would be some combination of mysterious, surreal, and foreboding. You could use pain as the recipient of these emotions in your narrative or vignette. --- End quote --- --- Quote ---It might not "understand". This is not an uncommon motif, and based on what we have seen, it has ability to preserve a lot of context from the source material. Especially the part about the pain, which is not preset in the prompt. I'd say its interpretation was more accurate than your intuition would have it. What we do not know, is how long this creature's memory is, or if it even has long-term memory at all. It could simply be trying to mimic the thing it just witnessed as a way of handling stress, but not recognize the pain part for what it is in the long-term. We also don't know enough about its biology to really say why it might have a particular reaction to pain that the creature you wrote about does not experience. We don't know enough about its actual relationship with pain, so we cannot speculate on that much further than "pain bothers it". --- End quote --- |
| ataradov:
What I get from all this is that it can reasonably well match a simple straightforward prompt to a decent response. But it is really not "smart" enough to understand more complex inputs, especially the ones that don't need an answer. It does not know that, so being asked to generate an answer, it just does it anyway. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |